Yes, this is troubling. Sometimes when I think about the case, I'm like, that's too much for the police to fake and too big a conspiracy. Other times, I'm like, "But none of this bleep sounds right. I'm sorry, it doesn't."
Especially this fire right there beside the dog. And you are right. there is a tank right there. He could have blown that whole place sky high if some embers blew off that thing, and it is important to ask how close can ANYTHING be to a 2000 degree fire without suffering some effects.
And forget about the smoke. What if the smoke blew in the direction of the living quarters?
I think I read that TH's farm has an incinerator or something. Is that true? And her ex lived on that farm or near it, right?
I mean, maybe they are idiots to begin with to have a burn pit that close to the house in the first place. But you would think it would take experience to know how to burn a human body to the degree she was burned if you are using an open pit. Otherwise, it would take a long time, like it took for that other murderer. It's hard to believe SA was so successful on his first try.
But I still have a hard time believing he was moving her around the property but didn't take enough care to get the hipbone or to totally get rid of the phone and other accessories that didn't fully burn. That makes no sense. You can be so intent on burning her down that you move her around, but then you don't bother getting rid of the phone carcass.
Looks like he had from Monday at 241pm until Thursday at 6-730pm before the police knew something, and then from then until Saturday morning to get rid of the stuff. Why did he not do it?