I'm still undecided. I think DB has said and done things that are inconsistent and puts the focus on her, makes you shake your head and wonder WTH is going on, but one of the reasons I can't say 100% that it's because of guilt is because of who her attorney is and how he operates, believing that he isn't really in this to find Lisa.
I don't know if what she does is due to guilt or bad advice. I know that it doesn't make it ok to take bad advice, it is her daughter and that should be first and foremost in her mind but I just can't decide if it proves guilt.
I have a hard time getting past the intruder entering the house with lights on but again, can't say that it's 100% false because stranger things have happened.
The one thing I do firmly believe is that LE didn't just decide to focus on DB just for the heck of it to be mean to them, or that they didn't want to look at anyone else but her. I firmly believe that LE's focus comes from inconsistencies that came from DB herself. LE doesn't have the luxury to just sit back and assume she's probably a nice person who wouldn't do such a thing, or try to decipher what they really might have meant when they say inconsistent things. They're going to keep the focus until they're convinced that they can move on. She wasn't helping them move on so the focus remained.
JMHO
BBM: I remember when I saw the first interview DB did -- and my "radar" shot through the roof ! And from my "first impression" -- up through today -- my opinion has NOT changed at all ...
In fact, the more Deb talks, the more inconsistencies I see, which confirms even more of my initial reaction, which is that Deb REALLY KNOWS WHAT HAPPENED to Baby Lisa ...
I never bought that "intruder" poppycock for one minute ... my reaction to that was like : "Really ? Please don't insult my intelligence with that bull ..."
IF -- a BIG IF -- Deb was "telling the TRUTH" -- there would be NO inconsistencies ... the "times" in her timeline would not have changed, and the "details" of that night would not have changed, and she would KNOW if she was "drunk" or not" .... and the list goes on and on and on ...
LE "focused" on Deb not only because OF her "continuouos" inconsistencies ... but the "story" Deb told LE did NOT match what LE has uncovered during their investigation ...
And to top it off, she will not even cooperate with LE's SOP : which is to interview the husband/wife -- girlfriend / boyfriend -- SEPARATELY ... So again, WHY does she have to be with Jeremy -- who IS an adult, holding his hand, while LE interviews him ?
Because she is "scared" Jeremy may get the "story" wrong ... or ... he may even "crack" ... JMO ... but he is the weakest link ...
Unfortunately, LE is not sharing with the public what they know ... sure wish they would :innocent: ...
MOO MOO and MOO ...