*Arrest* Holly Bobo investigation- TBI press conference 5 March 2014

steelman said:

What bothers me the most about this case now is the fact that there will be a waiting list of high profile lawyers just itching to take this case on for the publicity alone. The only court appointed attorney this rat deserves is the dumbest, drunkest, lowest bar-scoring lawyer in Tennessee. A bunch of slick lawyers trying to get this case dismissed on technicalities is enough to make people want to take a baseball bat to their televisions. Don't be surprised either if they end up assigning him a female attorney as well to help soften up his wife-beating reputation for the jury.

Click to expand...

jggordo said:

Most high profile lawyers tend to stay close to a major media center IMO. Also it helps if they have a client that looks good on TV. You could dress this guy in a (Gucci) suit, send him to hair and make up for four hours and that ain't gonna happen.

I don't believe any attorney wants to bump their resume by representing sheer evil. I could be wrong.

Click to expand...

steelman said:

Yes boys and girls, there IS a boogeyman, and this is what he looks like.

Click to expand...

shefner said:

This is a good time to discuss something important ~ Do not let a person remove you from your property without a fight. If there is anyway you can stay with your house, car, etc., do it. If someone is there that could hear you or help you, fight.
IF ZA had a knife, and I suspect he did and this is how Holly's blood ended up at the scene, she might could have screamed, cried, kicked and fought in the carport/garage area. Its a tough call to decide what to do at the moment. But once a perp removes you from the scene, your chances of survival go way down.
Something to think about ahead of time...because this happened suddenly and caught Holly off-guard. She was likely startled and dropped her drink can. Maybe when Clint thought he heard Holly say, "No, why," ZA was asking is there anybody here. Maybe Holly thought she could handle the situation...and talk ZA down a bit. I might think that too.
But strictly going by statistics, do not let an abductor get you in his vehicle unless he has a gun. With a knife, you have a chance to fight and run.
Just food for thought.
I'm sick.

Click to expand...

Yellow said:

This was on Oprah a few years ago when they discussed the book The Gift of Fear I think, they said NEVER move to the second location because nothing good comes at the second location. Always resist being moved from the first location even if gun, knife, etc. In many cases, a fight, especially if people are around, will startle the suspect and they will run and you can get free... nothing ever comes good at the second location and it is likely the second location is one you cannot escape from

Click to expand...

Sincerely said:

I'm not trying to go against the majority here...but the way it is worded...she was killed during the perpetration of...

perpetration means the carrying out of...

Is it possible she was actually killed or wounded badly enough on her porch that she died? There was a puddle of blood. Maybe CB saw them so close together because ZA was holding her up to walk? Just some thoughts...I tried finding the TN law on the exact reason for this wording (I just hadn't seen it before, or maybe I haven't paid attention before) but I am too tired tonight. Maybe someone else knows where to go for that. I think I had rather believe this.

Click to expand...

norest4thewicked said:

It's just semantics. People say things differently. I think that the way it was said is why so many are questioning this. The "kidnapping" does not necessarily mean the very moment she was walked into the woods and away from her home. It would last during the entire time that he held her against her will. She was obviously murdered during this time, thus the wording. She may have been killed that first day or held for days, weeks, months before she was murdered. During the time he took her from her home to the day she passed, that would have remained a "kidnapping".

Click to expand...

norest4thewicked said:

It's just semantics. People say things differently. I think that the way it was said is why so many are questioning this. The "kidnapping" does not necessarily mean the very moment she was walked into the woods and away from her home. It would last during the entire time that he held her against her will. She was obviously murdered during this time, thus the wording. He was "carrying out" holding her against her will all the time he held her. She may have been killed that first day or held for days, weeks, months before she was murdered. During the time he took her from her home to the day she passed, that would have remained a "kidnapping".

Click to expand...

Nana46 said:

This worries me if a news station has access to his FB and is putting out timelines....I wish they would let LE do their work...this guy does not need any help with an alibi.:banghead:

IMO

Click to expand...

Plumeria5 said:

Yesterday I was looking at his FB and I tried to look at entries around the time Holly was abducted. I believe 2011 was missing entirely. I guess LE blocked those? Wonder how the media got them?

Click to expand...