SharetheLight
Share the Light, Share the Love
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 2,077
- Reaction score
- 21
Where is everyone? THis forum has gone incredibly silent lately.
Is anyone out there??
Is anyone out there??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where is everyone? THis forum has gone incredibly silent lately.
Is anyone out there??
Does anyone know if the nursing home employees were questioned, even the ones not working that day? Also regular visitors that could have known that kids like to cut through the woods.The girls would have passed right buy there.
I think if the nursing home were involved it may be a regular visitor that took the girls. Someone who was there a lot and noticed the path kids took to and from places. Purely happenstance.
WOW!! Richard, what is your opinion of all of that? I know that you feel that Coffey is our best bet,but what do you make of Mileski and the possibility that he could have been involved? When you passed the tip on to LE,how well did they look into this? Thank you so much for filling us in. Nice work!!!
I will admit, that initially I was quite skeptical of the first bits of information that came in, but as more and more of it checked out, I became quite intrigued with the possibilities. The major problem with the informant's story was that it was all second or third hand hearsay, and all inadmissable in court. To obtain usable evidence, LE would have needed to have tracked down all the persons mentioned by the informant - and they seemed unwilling to do that.
The case officer may have interviewed the informant and he may have interviewed Mileski in prison, but I doubt that they did anything further with any information they may have gained from either. Certainly, there have been no new breaks in the case as a result, and I know of no extensive searches iniatiated as a result either.
As I said before, any information that MCP might have gotten from Mileski is buried in their files and not known to me.
Another major problem with the whole story was that so many people seemed to be involved and so many people supposedly "knew" things. In a case like this, it seems much more likely that only one person or at most two persons would be involved and they wouldn't talk about it.
.... Now, when LE dug test holes in Mileski's yard,was this because of what the other convicts said they had heard? I guess I'm asking,why his yard? Did the convicts say that Mileski said that he had put the girls there or did LE just decide to take a shot at the yard? ...
Good question. I really do not know all of what the convicts told MCP in 1982, but reading between the lines of what MCP told the press in their briefing, it would seem that these convicts believed that Mileski had been involved and that he had buried the girls "in his own back yard".
MCP took the tip literally and went to the people who owned the house in 1982 and got permission to dig.
I have seen the house on Suitland road and the entire back yard is very small. Most of it can be seen from the street and all of it can be observed from about a dozen other houses. It would be idiotic for him to have buried the girls there - where his family, all of his neighbors, and anyone driving by his house could see him.
IF Mileski really did bury the girls, he MIGHT have bragged that they were right "in my own back yard", speaking more figuratively and referring to a more remote place which was CLOSE to where he lived - such as in Suitland Bog, near a large power relay station, or in an area known as Andrew Jackson Pits. These are all places near his former residence.
In fact, the website informant said that the girls might be buried in "Andrew Jackson Pits", which was a large gravel pit area near Andrew Jackson Middle School. That area is now a large housing subdivision, but in the 1970's it was an undeveloped gravel pit area with a lot of trails where kids rode dirt bikes.
In his second letter, Mileski described (as the girls final resting place) a rural area with trees and water, and a lodge or cabin where one might go hunting or fishing. Of course, he was referring to having been TOLD this by the real abductor/killer whom he supposedly met "in the pen".
As to your question regarding the teenaged boarder, I really do not know much about the situation where Mileski took him in. Mileski had three sons of his own, but this other boy also lived with him according to the informant, and a newspaper article made reference to a "boarder" as well. The boy might have been a relative, or perhaps was a foster child, or maybe some other arrangement had been made between the boy's family and Mileski. I just do not know for certain.
The informant mentioned that Mileski either owned or rented another house or shop in an area just south of Iverson Mall - and that it was at this other place that the boy lived and/or worked for Mileski. Researching county land records, I was unable to find any property owned by Mileski, except for his Suitland Road residence. In 1977, at the time of the Mileski family murders, the boy was living with the Mileski family at the Suitland Road residence. The informant claimed to have been inside that house after the Mileski family shootings and said that the boy pointed out some bullet holes in the wall and door.
<snipped by me for space>
The informant mentioned that Mileski either owned or rented another house or shop in an area just south of Iverson Mall - and that it was at this other place that the boy lived and/or worked for Mileski. Researching county land records, I was unable to find any property owned by Mileski, except for his Suitland Road residence. In 1977, at the time of the Mileski family murders, the boy was living with the Mileski family at the Suitland Road residence. The informant claimed to have been inside that house after the Mileski family shootings and said that the boy pointed out some bullet holes in the wall and door.