They'll never try her without a conviction of SM first, IMO. And even then, I don't know......
Remind me.....has anyone connected to this case taken a polygraph?
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Oh I agree but I've seen very little evidence she was directly involved.This thought process bothers me so! Nothing at you TTF14 But it permeates throughout this thread, that first SM has to be convicted then maybe there is a remote chance to try TM but yet SM is seen as the appetizer and TM is the main coarse.
If this was planned..... most seem to think there was planning, I say TM would never sit idly at home while SM commits the deed. TM is in the back seat, hunkered/cowered down..
A few things that also bother me, if SM is smart enough to deny being at PTL on the 20th, why is TM so dumb to post on FB on the 2nd of January that he was there.
Both SM and TM need to be charged with murder and they better have a decent case put forward. These two idiots have no money and no dream team but they are going to get away with it if SC can not prosecute this case correctly.
Polly Caison speaks on behalf of daughter Tammy Moorer
Jun 24, 2016[FONT=&]Polly Caison, Tammy Moorer's mother, asks for the gag order to be lifted concerning the Sidney and Tammy Moorer kidnapping charges.
Read more here: http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/news/local/crime/article85901342.html#storylink=cpy
[/FONT]
http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/news/local/crime/article85901342.html
What the heck is she trying to say? Will the M's stop at nothing to get their message out, now her Mom is speaking to the media on her behalf?
What the heck is she trying to say? Will the M's stop at nothing to get their message out, now her Mom is speaking to the media on her behalf?
What the heck is she trying to say? Will the M's stop at nothing to get their message out, now her Mom is speaking to the media on her behalf?
This needs to be the cover photo for some of the reputable FB groups.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
What a troubling statement by that juror. Records of "what was said?" In this case, the victim called her roommate and BFF literally a few minutes after talking to SM and she told Bri exactly what SM said. How often do we get to see that kind of evidence? Did this jury just not pay any attention?
Even better!I suggest People Magazine
This needs to be the cover photo for some of the reputable FB groups.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
This thought process bothers me so! Nothing at you TTF14 But it permeates throughout this thread, that first SM has to be convicted then maybe there is a remote chance to try TM but yet SM is seen as the appetizer and TM is the main coarse.
If this was planned..... most seem to think there was planning, I say TM would never sit idly at home while SM commits the deed. TM is in the back seat, hunkered/cowered down..
A few things that also bother me, if SM is smart enough to deny being at PTL on the 20th, why is TM so dumb to post on FB on the 2nd of January that he was there.
Both SM and TM need to be charged with murder and they better have a decent case put forward. These two idiots have no money and no dream team but they are going to get away with it if SC can not prosecute this case correctly.
BBM - I think that post by TM on facebook was a fake post. I'm not trying to defend either one of these 2, but there were some fake posts on facebook. That was also the reason there were OJ charges for at least one of the 2 people charged.
I just thought of something which I don't think was asked. I guess the law in SC does not allow it, but isn't there such a thing as both sides get to strike a number of jurors during jury selection? If the law allowed certainly the state would have struck the friend of Truslow.
I think it was a fake post too, but it is interesting how much of the stuff that was rumored to be fake, actually came out to be true in the trial!