Sentencing and beyond- JA General Discussion #5

Status
Not open for further replies.
About that c-ck blocker infraction.

The lying liar murderess had apparently been on the phone with an attorney shortly before she lapsed into her gutter-speak. Wonder which attorney that was? As in, I very much doubt her appellate attorneys have anything to discuss with her, unless perhaps to tell her once again, no, you have no grounds to try to prevent JM's book from being distributed, even if it demolishes whatever shred of your "reputation" you think is still intact.

Perhaps Wilmott took her call? Even though she's no longer her attorney on record? Perhaps the has a message she wants to relay to MDLR?

Anyway, one other thing I picked up from the infraction report is that the has been spending time with other inmates, and the last thing that was pathetically obvious is that the is using the same manipulations that have served her so very poorly, lol.

She tried to manipulate the CO by involving him in the porter-inmate haircut thing. Poor little me just wants my hair cut- can you help? And upon being refused....see how unreasonably I'm treated- and you too, because you were the one refused when you asked.

Soo transparent.
 
About that c-ck blocker infraction.

The lying liar murderess had apparently been on the phone with an attorney shortly before she lapsed into her gutter-speak. Wonder which attorney that was? As in, I very much doubt her appellate attorneys have anything to discuss with her, unless perhaps to tell her once again, no, you have no grounds to try to prevent JM's book from being distributed, even if it demolishes whatever shred of your "reputation" you think is still intact.

Perhaps Wilmott took her call? Even though she's no longer her attorney on record? Perhaps the has a message she wants to relay to MDLR?

Anyway, one other thing I picked up from the infraction report is that the has been spending time with other inmates, and the last thing that was pathetically obvious is that the is using the same manipulations that have served her so very poorly, lol.

She tried to manipulate the CO by involving him in the porter-inmate haircut thing. Poor little me just wants my hair cut- can you help? And upon being refused....see how unreasonably I'm treated- and you too, because you were the one refused when you asked.

Soo transparent.

What I don't understand and where she thinks she has rights? She has nothing. She will rot away in Perryville. :jail:

Also, I bet she is BS'ing about her 4 lb weight gain. Because as we know, she blows things out of proportion. She probably put on alot more than that. JMO.
 
Will Sheriff Joe ever tell about her having those index cards with her trying to copy Travis's handwriting in PEN. Why didn't Juan bring that up in the prosecutions case in chief?

I wondered the same.... I thought maybe the Judge wouldn't allow it or Martinez didn't want to open the door realizing how the always had another story... I have rewatched trial testimony and was amazed at how many times the lied by saying "0h i wasn't referring to that time. I have always enjoyed listening to trials and many times respected Defense attorneys for their professional behavior, even when disagreeing with them but this team were awful in my view putting so much on the sexual exploits especially when their client was one of the worst skanks I have ever heard in a trial. I feel bad that Travis didn't walk away much sooner. Nurmi put way too much emphasis on sex and Wilmont was arrogant and sassy with procecution witnesses that gave honest and more educational responses to questions.
 
I thought the phrase was basically calling the CO a lesbian- someone who blocks c***! Is that not the way it was meant?

She's something else. She has to be seething right about now- we all know how physically dangerous she becomes when that happens.
 
I just ran into this article and came here to see you guys beat me to it. This made my day, LOL, how funny.:happydance:
 
Jodi has to behave for 180 days to get her privileges back? Is that possible? :floorlaugh::hilarious::floorlaugh::hilarious: Can she appeal?
 
Fox news just covered the story about an hour ago on cable news. It'll be replayed throughout the day probably.
 
Jodi has to behave for 180 days to get her privileges back? Is that possible? :floorlaugh::hilarious::floorlaugh::hilarious: Can she appeal?

I especially love your row of BAM! BAM!s, as in "Gotcha good, Jodith, BAM! redundant LMAO 4 times over." I'm adding the BAMBAM's to my repertoire 'cos I need them alot.
 
I thought the phrase was basically calling the CO a lesbian- someone who blocks c***! Is that not the way it was meant?

She's something else. She has to be seething right about now- we all know how physically dangerous she becomes when that happens.

I took it to mean "someone who's tight in the netherparts". So, in addition to assaulting someone with a vulgar epithet, this was a snub:Jodi has historically been very proud of her netherparts' looseness and general availability.
 
Is this correct, or did she just lose "contact" visitation privileges? She's not allowed to use the phone, either, right?

Does this punishment means she's been rolled back a whole "phase" in the rewards system, so she's got lower limits on commissary as well and still must have 2 guards at all times?

She's still in phase 3, apparently, and still has visitation even. "All" that was taken away was contact visitation. The CO could have just tsked tsked, basically, or chosen a formal reprimand penalty that didn't mean as much to her.

Sounds to me like the CO deliberately chose a penalty that would kick her hardest in the gut in the off chance the will begin to understand she is NOT in control any more and never will be again.

She still does have that 2 guard escort, which I think is why the reprimand made note of the 's nonchalence about bucking authority even when she's almost quite literally chained to it.
 
For those interested.....twitter hasn't been this buzzy about the in quite a long time. Even WAT is there looking for company. :)
 
Has anybody checked what her supporters are saying about this outrageous mistreatment of their hero? (Sarcasm off now)
 
Her supporter site is exactly what I expected. They are all saying that the guards have it in for her and were trying to find anything to stop her from getting contact visits, just to mess with her head. They are even calling for the ACLU to step in to protect her rights. :laughing:
 
ja lost 180 day privilege for infraction 2/3
It on her doc prison page


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
8b153a6694e1a20e02181c7227058b95.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
What a great quote by JM, tweeted by Troy Hayden:

"I always saw her as a bad waitress. She brings bad food, not her fault. Coffee's cold, not her fault."



Go Juan!! (Nurmi: hint--this is the art of subtle put downs, so much more effective than wild flailing and petty low blows).
 
9da09bc5aa257ca8f4900e114aa6e29c.jpg


Ja doc page


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
88
Guests online
3,920
Total visitors
4,008

Forum statistics

Threads
591,857
Messages
17,960,166
Members
228,625
Latest member
julandken
Back
Top