Amanda Knox tried for the murder of Meredith Kercher in Italy *NEW TRIAL*#4

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/dateline/49768727

Such as in the case of Sheila Davalloo, although she had murdered Anna Lisa Raymundo by bludgeoning and stabbing her nine times in the victims own home there were no fingerprints, no DNA , nothing of the killer found at the bloodied crime scene, except for a tiny drop of her blood mixed with the victim's on a sink handle in Anna Lisa's bathroom.
Interesting info. In addition they had the digitalized 911 call pointing to the defendant.....In another vein, circumstantial evidence (which makes inference necessary) can and does render convictions, in many cases being more powerful than direct evidence.

In the media, as this recent Washington Post /Europe piece indicates, the DNA and knife-as-murder-weapon are being widely dismissed:

New DNA evidence at Knox murder trial fails to prove that kitchen knife was murder weapon

By Associated Press, Published: November 6
FLORENCE, Italy — U.S. student Amanda Knox’s defense got a boost on Wednesday when a new DNA test on a kitchen knife failed to conclusively prove that it was the murder weapon used to kill her British roommate.

An expert witness testified that the minuscule DNA trace on the knife handle near the blade showed “considerable affinity” with Knox’s own DNA.

That confirmed what was already known from two previous trials: that Knox’s DNA was on the knife handle, identified through another trace.

No DNA belonging to the slain British student, Meredith Kercher, was identified. Previous genetic evidence on the blade linked to Kercher had been contested at earlier stages.

Outside the court, Knox defense lawyer Carlo Dalla Vedova told The Associated Press that the testimony confirms his contention that the knife was used by Knox solely for preparing food. “The report confirms that this is a kitchen knife. It is not a murder weapon,” Dalla Vedova said.

Luca Maori, a defense lawyer for Knox’s co-defendant Raffaele Sollecito, said the trace’s very existence also indicated the knife had not been washed. “It is something very important,” he said. “It is absurd to use it for a murder and put it back in the drawer.”

Prosecutors deferred comment for their summations, due later this month.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...176e46-46c2-11e3-95a9-3f15b5618ba8_story.html
 
In Perugia, Knox moved in with two professionals (legal) and an Erasmus student from England. She had just blown off a job in Berlin and toked/slept her way from Germany to Italy. Knox was a language student at the foreigners university. Knox started her class well after Meredith. Everyone at the cottage had goals and dreams that they were living. I doubt any of them expected that Knox would hang her vibrator in the bathroom, fail to flush, repeatedly sing one bar on the guitar, irregularly burst into song in a restaurant, bring strange men home, get stoned as often as she ate pasta, bond with strangers through a mutual vice of getting stoned, and generally disrupt that calm environment that Laura, Filomina and Meredith had before Knox arrived.

Knox did not fit with Meredith and her friends (all attending the University with Meredith). She did not fit with the law professional's social life of Laura and Filomina. She did not have anything more as

than a hook-up with the four men living on the main floor of the cottage. Meredith had been dating one of the four. Knox did not fit with La Chic. Knox's job had been given to Meredith, although Meredith had not accepted the offer. On Halloween, Knox contacted Meredith several times. It appears that Knox was hoping to be included, but she was not. The murder occurred the following day.

That morning, November 1, Knox woke up early and went to the cottage. Sollecito joined her later, around 12:30 (he made pasta). Had Meredith woken up before Sollecito arrived?
that is incredible background on this case; and so there was a motive; jealousy, she was jealous of Meredith wasn't she. I've always thought she was but didn't know if there was any motivation behind that......I think she is about as guilty as ty come. I always have thought that the Italian courts had it right and so did the media; her behavior and presence were absolutely bizarre. Also they were truly immature. I mean; her actions. I wonder really if she felt inferior to all of them. She most likely did, as an American.
 
Filomina's window should have been well lit by the street lights on the night of the murder.

 
The window is clearly visible from the road, as there is no fence that interferes with visibility.

 
I found more 'scuff marks' :)
 

Attachments

  • rh80.jpg
    rh80.jpg
    18.5 KB · Views: 23
In Perugia, Knox moved in with two professionals (legal) and an Erasmus student from England. She had just blown off a job in Berlin and toked/slept her way from Germany to Italy. Knox was a language student at the foreigners university. Knox started her class well after Meredith. Everyone at the cottage had goals and dreams that they were living. I doubt any of them expected that Knox would hang her vibrator in the bathroom, fail to flush, repeatedly sing one bar on the guitar, irregularly burst into song in a restaurant, bring strange men home, get stoned as often as she ate pasta, bond with strangers through a mutual vice of getting stoned, and generally disrupt that calm environment that Laura, Filomina and Meredith had before Knox arrived.

Knox did not fit with Meredith and her friends (all attending the University with Meredith). She did not fit with the law professional's social life of Laura and Filomina. She did not have anything more than a hook-up with the four men living on the main floor of the cottage. Meredith had been dating one of the four. Knox did not fit with La Chic. Knox's job had been given to Meredith, although Meredith had not accepted the offer. On Halloween, Knox contacted Meredith several times. It appears that Knox was hoping to be included, but she was not. The murder occurred the following day.

<modsnip>

as one example of how truth has been incorrectly portrayed/exaggerated/misrepresented:

Chilling pictures of Meredith murder scene reveal apartment bloodbath horror... The bathroom (is) covered in blood
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-scene-reveal-apartment-bloodbath-horror.html


One shows the bathroom... it's walls, floor, sink, and toilet smeared with blood
http://blog.seattlepi.com/thebigblog/2008/01/16/pictures-from-the-crime-scene-released-in-knox-case/

picture.php


Amanda_Knox_-_Bathroom_Fallacy_-_What_Amanda_Saw_WMV_V9_0001.jpg
 
The window is clearly visible from the road, as there is no fence that interferes with visibility.


inaccurate perspective.

the google earth cam sits a good 4-5 feet above the vehicle... and much higher than anyone seated in a car driving by:

picture.php
 
inaccurate perspective.

the google earth cam sits a good 4-5 feet above the vehicle... and much higher than anyone seated in a car driving by:

picture.php
So is this perspective through the fencing and into the cottage, from a webcam which is driver-height, the accurate one?

[video=youtube;Vsbq7T8Tn4M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vsbq7T8Tn4M[/video]
 
Well, they deliberately misled with their headline to sell papers. Obviously the bright pink in the bath looks nothing like blood, and is a luminol type substance. The blood picture is the one to the right, (when you link to the actually article, and see the pics side by side) with the smearing on the floor, in the murder room. The blood at the site of the murder is obviously authentic. No one could mistake that bright pink for blood. It looks like food coloring.
 
Well, they deliberately misled with their headline to sell papers. Obviously the bright pink in the bath looks nothing like blood, and is a luminol type substance. The blood picture is the one to the right, (when you link to the actually article, and see the pics side by side) with the smearing on the floor, in the murder room. The blood at the site of the murder is obviously authentic. No one could mistake that bright pink for blood. It looks like food coloring.

It's the Daily Mail. I think we all know what to expect from that source.
 
Looks like those pics are taken in a different season tho as the vegetation is thick and green. Murder happened in November. The cottage did not look like that.
 

I doubt anyone who believes them to be guilty came to that conclusion based on that bathroom photo. So that's a moot point. Amanda's PR team has done their fair share media spin.
 
Love your Arias line at the bottom of your post aa.

Like she just figured it out. Haha. Nice.

:floorlaugh:

And the way she said it was like she had just discovered the cure for cancer or something
 
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/dateline/49768727

Such as in the case of Sheila Davalloo, although she had murdered Anna Lisa Raymundo by bludgeoning and stabbing her nine times in the victims own home there were no fingerprints, no DNA , nothing of the killer found at the bloodied crime scene, except for a tiny drop of her blood mixed with the victim's on a sink handle in Anna Lisa's bathroom.

Oh wow. That is pretty incredible. And how weird was it that she was her own lawyer....that must have been a strange, strange trial.
 
With regards to the view of Filomena's window from the street, I think that the main point is that there is much more risk with that wndow than somewhere towards the back of the house. It is visible from the street, that's undeniable.

Also, let's say Rudy managed to get up to the window as the climber did, using his athleticism. So he is hanging from the windowsill, as it shows the climber doing.....then he would have to have pulled himself up with his hands firmly on the wndowsill, then sort of lunged forward through the window. His entire body, from forearms to feet, would have had contact with that windowill as he pulled himself through it.

So I do not believe that he could have done all of that, and the police would still think the window was staged. It would have been an obvious true window entry, IMO.
 
Well, they deliberately misled with their headline to sell papers. Obviously the bright pink in the bath looks nothing like blood, and is a luminol type substance. The blood picture is the one to the right, (when you link to the actually article, and see the pics side by side) with the smearing on the floor, in the murder room. The blood at the site of the murder is obviously authentic. No one could mistake that bright pink for blood. It looks like food coloring.
It was enough to fool Judy Bachrach of Vanity Fair, and an intelligent and central commenter on the Duke Lacrosse case, "Joan Foster," who had a hand in forming Liestoppers. Bachrach wrote, "She had found the bathroom she shared with Meredith smeared with so much blood it looked as though a butcher had attempted washing up and then given up the task." Releasing that photo when AK and RS were already incarcerated runs roughshod over the principle that the prosecution should remain silent while a matter is sub judice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
75
Guests online
3,074
Total visitors
3,149

Forum statistics

Threads
592,284
Messages
17,966,629
Members
228,735
Latest member
dil2288
Back
Top