Remember, the body was not encased in concrete, just covered. Dogs should have been able to find the body fairly easy.
If this was a spontaneous dump, then digging a hole usually entails more work than someone would think at first. This would suggest imo that the cement came as an afterthought to further conceal.
I find it perplexing though that LE says no visual trauma. That being the case, why not just do a river dump? At least that had the possibility of being a wandered away and accidental drowning incident.
This screams sloppy, to the point of wanting her to be discovered, iow, someone wanted to boast, but doesn't have as much experience or boldness at this point in time.
moo
ETA; the hole was not dug, it was already there, from what the fisherman said,
link in next post.
I'd like to delete this post, but it's already been quoted.
So I'll add thoughts instead.
There were stones placed perhaps as markers. She may have been buried alive. No hole was dug, but cement was used to cover her over, instead of using dirt, or rocks. Why cement?
She apparently was fully dressed, like SC, perhaps buried alive like JL.
Theory; an SO did his deed either there or somewhere else. My opinion, she was alive when she got to that site. Marker stones, he wanted to come back and relive it.
Why cement? He thought it would protect the crime from being discovered, he thought it would be effective in covering up the odor, perhaps. I don't know how well this specific site is known or used by fishermen. It seems he either was lazy and knew the hole was there, so he didn't have to dig one, or he wanted to remember exactly where she was, and a more secluded spot could also have been a place he might not be able to find again.
ok, too sick for me to keep thinking about it.
rayer: 
