Okay it seems I created quite a confusion, which was not my intention.
I will give it one more try.
What I tried to say is, it seems possible for me that the police suggested Lumumba COULD HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH IT.
Lumumba wrote in a text message that there is no need for Knox to do her shift. She responded "Okay, ci vediamo piu tardi." (Okay, see you later.) "See you later" is an english phrase which is used very often - you would say to someone "see you later" even if you knew that you are not going to meet this person again soon.
But, translated to the Italian language, "ci vediamo piu tardi" means something different, even though the translation is correct. If you say that sentence to someone, you are going to have a definite appointment with that person, in the next couple of hours.
If you do not have an appointment, you will need to use another term. In english, you can use it with or without appointment.
I made this point because I experienced this myself when spending two years abroad in the UK. People there were telling me all the time that they would "see me later" and I found it strange, because I did not have an appointment with them. I got used to it eventually.
Knox probably did not about this, and she just used this term because she translated it in her mind directly from English to Italian.
Now we have the scenario of the police first questioning Knox. She gave her cellphone willingly to them and they eventually found her message to Lumumba saying "Ci vediamo piu tardi".
Hence they assumed Knox had an apointment that evening with this man.
They asked her if she met someone and she said she did not. That is when police got suspicious (rightfully) because of this message in which she wrote it down. Then they call her a liar and they put her under pressure (using words - I DO NOT believe they hit her) to tell them the truth. They probably went on asking "who is this man? how do you know him? why are you saying you didnt meet him, when you wrote that message to him? You must be lying, are you trying to cover him up? why? what did he do? did he kill meredith?" etc. etc.
Up to this point the above seems problable to me.
Then, Knox under pressure, maybe thought "hey, lets make up a story. They want to hear I met Lumumba, so I might just tell them I really did and fabricate a huge story about him killing Meredith. They will hopefully buy the story and then they will let me go and put him to prison."
Later, when Lumumba was set free because of several alibis, she said she was "confused" as police "suggested" to her Lumumba did it. Which, in fact, COULD be seen as the truth, because they did. What Knox did not say, of course, is that she fabricated the whole story to clear her name.
That is why I was saying I can see where that statement comes from.
I dont know if it is the truth, but is seems probable to me.
I believe in her guilt anyway.
Sorry for any grammar mistakes :blushing: