He didn't - he said that brendan was going to help steve clean the garage. My wording was poor.
But again, if he doesn't say bleach was used to clean, does that even matter ? what if he used 401 ? what if he used pine sol ?
I just mentioned bryan , because he is another person who mentions cleaning of steve's garage floor.
I mention bleach because it matches the pants. So why is it unrealistic to assume he used bleach ? i find it funny that people have a problem with that.
If they chose to use oxygenated bleach, wouldn't that indicate they understood more than most of us that it was capable of cleaning blood ???
But that would have been capable of cleaning blood -- which we know was not the case here, whether chlorine bleach was used or not, because there was a luminol hit for blood
haha. This is bizarre why anyone is having trouble getting that the reason they didn't specify the bleach in the trial is because the type was irrelevant. It was assumed that it was chlorine bleach because of brendan's pants.
Chlorine bleach is a common crime scene contaminant. When chlorine bleach is poured in a garage to the extent it is splashing on Brendan's pants, and used to wipe up blood, that garage should have lit up like a Christmas tree, and wiping patterns should have been present. I linked an article about this in thread #2. The jurors shouldn't be assuming what kind of bleach is used, this is a trial, it deals w. evidence. if the State wants to use Brendan's pants to show he used chlorine bleach to clean Avery's garage, then prove it, and I'll accept it. Until then, I'm not accepting Brendan cleaned that garage on hearsay and his "confession". I respect your opinion on this issue, but I think it's completely valid for people to also believe that chlorine bleach was not used to clean Avery's garage.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk