someoneschild
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2009
- Messages
- 59
- Reaction score
- 4
I have been searching for a match for this UID for months-Case id number 651 http://www.fluiddb.com/
Found same day that he died-10-5-1999
36-45
Blonde or Strawberry Blonde Hair/ Blue eyes
5'6
173 pounds
Today, I noticed a recently added file on the Doe Network site that I think deserves consideration as a potential match.
Danny Lee Jones-Endangered Runaway
DOB: Jan 26,1959
Missing: September, 1, 1974-15 years old.
5'5 150 pounds
Blonde Hair/Blue Eyes
http://www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PubCaseSearchServlet?act=viewChildDetail&caseNum=1138343&orgPrefix=NCMC&seqNum=1&caseLang=en_US&searchLang=en_US
There isn't much to go on with this one...just the physical description and the artists rendering and age progression photo.
The age looks right. The UID would have been 40 in 1999.
The age progression photo shows Danny at 51.
It looks like the artist attempted to illustrate a dimple in Danny's age progression photo. The UID's artist rendering appears to have a dimple as well.
There is no mention of a scar on the UID-just stretch marks...Danny had a scar on his right arm.
It seems that because the body was found immediately after death this should be any easy match but maybe the reason he remains a UID after 11 years is because he has been missing since he was a child.
As always your comments would be appreciated.
Found same day that he died-10-5-1999
36-45
Blonde or Strawberry Blonde Hair/ Blue eyes
5'6
173 pounds
Today, I noticed a recently added file on the Doe Network site that I think deserves consideration as a potential match.
Danny Lee Jones-Endangered Runaway
DOB: Jan 26,1959
Missing: September, 1, 1974-15 years old.
5'5 150 pounds
Blonde Hair/Blue Eyes
http://www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PubCaseSearchServlet?act=viewChildDetail&caseNum=1138343&orgPrefix=NCMC&seqNum=1&caseLang=en_US&searchLang=en_US
There isn't much to go on with this one...just the physical description and the artists rendering and age progression photo.
The age looks right. The UID would have been 40 in 1999.
The age progression photo shows Danny at 51.
It looks like the artist attempted to illustrate a dimple in Danny's age progression photo. The UID's artist rendering appears to have a dimple as well.
There is no mention of a scar on the UID-just stretch marks...Danny had a scar on his right arm.
It seems that because the body was found immediately after death this should be any easy match but maybe the reason he remains a UID after 11 years is because he has been missing since he was a child.
As always your comments would be appreciated.