Beyond Belief
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2005
- Messages
- 14,496
- Reaction score
- 93
Geez, maybe the guy was home in bed. They would be all over this if they thought they had this solved.
So are you saying you think he's involved?
That's why he said he wanted to stop the rumor before it started!!!!! He is not involved....
I beg to differ...He stated at the first, when ask why bring up this guy, that he wanted to stop the rumors. That he had had calls about this and wanted to straighten it out.
I didn't take it that way. I took it that he was dispelling rumor that an arrest had been made in the case but he said at this time there was no connection that they knew of (leaving the door open). When one reporter asked if he was being questioned the Sherf. said yes. I don't think it is that open and shut at this point....but oh how I hate the wording in pressers LOL...
I think the shrf's statements were made to calm down the public and they are still looking into him
imhoo :blowkiss:
Although you have stated ( I think 3 times) that LE said he's not involved, how I heard it was that they have not connected him to Hayleigh, this guy lives less than a mile from her house, his GPS unit allows him to go 1 mile without sending signals to the police. He could have gone to her house and they can't prove it yet, he has been arrested because last night he left the 1 mile zone. Who's to say he was hiding something out of his 1 mile zone.... They also said they are going to search his home again, if he were cleared why would they do that?
IMO of course.:waitasec:
So are you saying you think he's involved?
His gps monitor will know where he was, and any possible hiding place he may have taken Haleigh, but I dont think he did. He was the first one interviewed, they have looked him over with a fine toothed comb.
If he was monitored from 10-6, and he took Haleigh, and they came and interviewed him at 530 am, where was Haleigh? NOT WITH HIM
Has anyone heard where haleighs bus stop is located.
Wonder how many families living in Putnam with kids, after this is over, will be packing up and moving to a less SO infested town?
and where could he have hidden her in that period of time that she wouldnt have been found by now?You guys, think about it. Say he took Haleigh anytime that evening....His monitor was working from 10pm till 6 am. Are you thinking he took her at 8? 9? How did he get her???Misty walked him over there??? Police went to his trailer at 530 a.m. His activities the previous night, from 10pm until 6 am would have been accounted for due to gps. LE was there at 530 am. They have given out more info on this guy than ANYONE else, including the a/c repairman...to clear him and put the heat on Misty where IMO it belongs. They went overboard to dispel this rumor.
I may say it 5 or 6 more times. :crazy: The Sheriff said they were going to "just to double check".
remember the little girl in Jacksonville (and I am so sorry my mind will not let me recall her precious name....my blood sugar is low!) who was murdered by the neighbor boy and stuffed under the water bed? LE were in that home more than once. Same goes for John Couey and little Jessica was a neighbor. These sickos find a way. It is very strange, in light of the fact that a small child is missing, that he would dare break curfew and I sure am interested to find out what his reasons were. At least LE has him locked up without bond and are questioning him, and according to wftv, set to re~search his house.His gps monitor will know where he was, and any possible hiding place he may have taken Haleigh, but I dont think he did. He was the first one interviewed, they have looked him over with a fine toothed comb.
If he was monitored from 10-6, and he took Haleigh, and they came and interviewed him at 530 am, where was Haleigh? NOT WITH HIM
Ya got me there !!!!Doesn't mean his friends, relatives, and associates have monitors. ANYONE could have been in his home and left with the child.....almost begins to make some sense of the crazy dog tracking paths.