PARENTS KILLED AMBER ALERT ISSUED FOR 13-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER
---
POLICE NEED PUBLIC'S HELP IN FINDING MISSING AND PREGNANT KIERRA COLES

2010.02.11 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority

Discussion in 'Caylee Anthony 2 years old' started by The World According, Feb 11, 2010.

  1. The World According

    The World According Inactive

    Messages:
    3,722
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  2. QB.

    QB. New Member

    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    World - how did you get that motion so fast?
     
  3. QB.

    QB. New Member

    Messages:
    1,959
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would like to see the motion defense filed to object to the ex parte hearing, is that possible?
     
  4. sleutherontheside

    sleutherontheside Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    9,875
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    regarding bold.........

    Ummmmmmm bare assertion.....Dear Pot, Is that you???? Love, Kettle
     
  5. Tulessa

    Tulessa Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    22,313
    Likes Received:
    699
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I love it when these slow days end up in a bang! :D
     
  6. JBean

    JBean Retired WS Administrator

    Messages:
    52,752
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have not had a chance to look through this all yet. But if it is several new motions can we give them each separate threads so the discussion isn't a melting pot of all the new motions? If this thread is already only about one motion can we edit it to reflect that.
    thanks
     
  7. marspiter

    marspiter Blah Blah Blah

    Messages:
    1,219
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What I think will be interesting is if the SA didn't want the info released because it was to inflammatory to Casey's case. Then the Defense with this motion causes the info to be released and basically sinks it's own case.

    Kinda like shaking a can of soda and handing it to someone and saying here hold this.....knowing full well they will open it.
     
  8. Chiquita71

    Chiquita71 New Member

    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Respectfully Quoted The World According :)
    Underlined by me because you already had it bold.

    I thought part of what the prosecution is wanting is that the defense not be privy to this "certain materials and information?" If that is true then why would the defense say the prosecutors "offered nothing in support of their claim?"

    What is the defense asking for with this statement? What is it they are wanting from the prosecution that they are not getting?

    TIA

    ...jmo...
     
  9. Chiquita71

    Chiquita71 New Member

    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I see if I read the thread "motions filed 2-11-10" I will have a much better understanding of what these motions are and what they mean. I go there now.

    Thanks
     
  10. LambChop

    LambChop Former Member

    Messages:
    21,160
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maybe I am being a little picky here but on page 2 of this motion, second paragraph one of the sentences starts out with "Being that TES is no longer concerned..." It somehow sounds as if an 8th grader wrote that sentence and not someone with legal background. Maybe it's just me???
     
  11. Tulessa

    Tulessa Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    22,313
    Likes Received:
    699
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, it's not just you. That is so childish on so many levels..........
     
  12. Aedrys

    Aedrys If justice doesn't get you, karma will.

    Messages:
    6,719
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have GOT to be kidding me...

    He's accusing the STATE of having made a claim with NO EVIDENCE to back it up???

    Hello, Baez? You forget about Macaluso already? And where's YOUR evidence? Are we in kindergarten? I won't show you mine, but you have to show me yours?

    What a freaking CROCK!!!! He is going to be laughed out of court on this one. I mean, really. Does he think the judge is just going to ignore that the defense itself didn't do that very thing just weeks ago? Is he seriously this mental? Why would you chance the judge throwing the same thing back in your face? I really don't get this.

    You can't have your cake and eat it too, Baez, no matter how much you try. Not even clapping your hands while saying "I believe in motions, I do, I do!" is going to save this one. This is beyond pathetic. This is just plain stupid. Maybe he's hoping he won't have to go into court and defend this, and for that reason, I hope a hearing IS called!

    And hey you lawyer types, I really want to know something. Is there a point to writing a motion that's going to be turned over before the ink even dries, like this one? Or is this just REALLY throwing out as many motions as possible and hoping something sticks? Seems like REAL desperation at this point...

    I'm starting to think the defense has a dart board o' motions up, and they blindfold themselves and throw darts, and whatever gets hit, they decide to write a motion on that. Or a wheel o' motions, and they spin it, and whatever it stops on, that's what motion(s) will be made that day. Both make as much sense as anything else they do...
     
  13. RainyGirl

    RainyGirl Inactive

    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
     

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice