He seemed likable to me. So he's old, is there anything wrong with that? He seemed to lighten up the atmosphere. Its good to see Kc smile, its time to stop the name calling and get back to the evidence. If Kc walks, its because she is truly innocent, not because this man made her innocent. There is nothing to be afraid of. If the evidence is there, then it will show she is guilty. So far, the evidence just isn't there in my opinion.
1.31 days her daughter is missing and she does not report it
2.her car smells like a "damn dead body", and she was the last known to drive it.. By Tony's statement that he picked her up at the amscot.
3.She says she dropped her daughter off at Sawgrass Apt which has been empty for several months... then you say you were held down at a park and your daughter was taken.
4. She has no phone number, or address nor can she prove that she ever had numbers or addresses of the so called Nanny.
5. She lied about working at Universal.
6. She was the last one seen with the Caylee.
7. Her exact words " In my heart I know she is close to home" and low and behold she is found in the woods close to her home.
8. The garbage bags, and laundry bag, and duct tape found with the remains, similar to that at the home
9. No proof of a nanny, no one has seen a nanny, and she had no need for a nanny because she had no job.
10. Now its not the Nanny, it might be, Kronk, Grund, Amy... and umm who else have they tried to pin this on???? Seems like if you dropped your child off with a nanny you would know who the nanny is, but they dont seem to know who she is... OH wait she is a 10 with brown hair, brown, eyes, drives a silver car has a sister name Samantha... Ummm Kronk, Grund, and Amy DO NOT FIT that discription.
and these are just a few, so yes the evidence is there........ and the jury will see that.
