I am way behind, as my replying to this post will tell you (see, I do go back and read everything!) but my understanding was that JB said judge could rule from the motion. When JP asked JA if he wanted time to file he said it was the same argument and gave judge permission to rule based on his same objections.
While it was never stated what was under seal (that I heard, and it kinda negates the purpose of putting it under seal) I do believe that it might have been the photos the defense has objections to. I also thought I heard the judge say that they will schedule an in camera to review. In addition nothing was said in open court about them and the stack of cd's was on the table. I think I made a pic today that marks them. At one point KC or her legal assistant held them up and it was clear that was what they were.
If already answered - boo me, but please no :Banane27:!!!!!!!!
I saw that Patty (well Misha, thank you cutie pie) uploaded Rob from today. Was there anything else we needed off todays IS? If nobody requests anything I will delete it tomorrow night -- so write me inner office mail or post here -- or it really matters, do both!
