TortillaChip
New Member
- Joined
- May 11, 2011
- Messages
- 410
- Reaction score
- 0
I think JA just went up there to contest his area of expertise.
Did I blink and miss JB's direct?!
Yeah, really. ALL that hub-bub for what? :waitasec:
Will Baez definitely be fined, sanctioned, after this trial?
TIA
Mason is a BIG PART of the problem no matter what we think of JB. As an officer of the court Mason could have addressed many issues of JB's behavior and or pointed them out to the State, The Court, the FL Bar but he sat back and left JB continue. Mason is supposedly there for over-sight and assistance in this case. He is as guilty as Jose Baez.
I dont think we missed direct- JA is now doing a voir dire.
I just thought the same exact thing!If I am on the jury, I'm thinking.... Jeeze they couldn't find anyone in the USA for this? :waitasec:
The only "game playing" I have seen the SA engage in is not doing the jobs for the DT when they would whine Pretrial about issues. The SA did not jump through hoops to do the DT jobs for them. THAT is the ONLY thing that I can see anyone construing as "game playing" by the SA. There were no delays due to reports not being submitted during their CIC. I get sick of them being lumped into this whole circus. They have been professional and had to do double the work they should due to the slimy unusual DT. JMHO