2011.06.26 WEBSLEUTHS RADIO with Beth Karas & Richard Hornsby

Discussion in 'Caylee Anthony 2 years old' started by Tricia, Jun 23, 2011.

  1. ynotdivein

    ynotdivein Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    11,425
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Area code 803: missed WS name! Sorry! ask BK what she thinks of ABC financing defense fund for woman accused of killing her baby.

    BK: They are within their rights. Believe that money went pretty quickly.

    Caller: Ethically, as a journalist?

    BK: It is ok if it's a licensing fee. Can make argument if it's really high, you are buying story. My network ok's minimal fees but Turner family doesn't have those rules.

    RH: If ICA testifies, will the ABC deal be admissible?

    BK: Hadn't thought about it but I think it would be...
     


  2. Capri

    Capri New Member

    Messages:
    4,776
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    great ? Richard
     
  3. ynotdivein

    ynotdivein Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    11,425
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yay it was Blaise! Hi Blaise!
     
  4. Omachka

    Omachka Member

    Messages:
    771
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Check the app store for apps that will play blog talk radio. I use Cinch but I think there are others.
     
  5. dax

    dax Justice for Caylee

    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm curious as to Beth's opinion of all the leading questions that JB asks...why is he being allowed to lead all these witnesses. I know JA objects and is sustained but the harm is done by then

    I first saw Beth during the Westerfield case....she explains everything so we can understand and "see" what she's seeing!

    .
     
  6. ynotdivein

    ynotdivein Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    11,425
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    jacassa question: Is JA guilty of wit tampering?

    BK: Rodriguez issue... we don't know all the facts about that. There may be gamesmanship going on there, but not mistrial--DOD saw him on TV, not surprising given coverage of case if his bosses saw him there. Doesn't think JA wit tampered.

    RH: Fed gov't can fine him (not sure Rodrig or JA), not a big surprise that feds had problem, you can't just go subpoenaing fed employees.
     
  7. JBounds

    JBounds I feel lucky

    Messages:
    2,904
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Question

    Why would Casey subject herself to a DP trial when all she had to do was confess to this supposed drowning theory and get a lighter sentence?
     
  8. ynotdivein

    ynotdivein Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    11,425
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    RH: fed gov't makes a big deal when you start subpoenaing fed employees which is why DT bowed out on him

    BK: Threat of firing should not keep him off the stand if he is needed for defense

    RH: Think DT backed off bc did not dot i's cross t's so they backed off
     
  9. Emma Peel

    Emma Peel Keep your bowler hat on in times of trouble, & bew

    Messages:
    9,898
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Maybe this has been asked answered but ...

    I am just so uncomfortable that Cindy & George have play such significant roles testifying yet they are allowed to stay in the courtroom. Is this typical? For witness parents and witness victims to be allowed to stay in the courtroom?
     
  10. tsitra01

    tsitra01 Member

    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I remember reading that the neighbor who heard the fight was not sure of the date so they were unable to do anything with that news.
     
  11. ynotdivein

    ynotdivein Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    11,425
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NewsJunkie: Compound question! Rodriguez, was he the one who wouldn't return JB phone calls?

    (No one remembered for sure)

    NJ: Are CA/GA/LA still not allowed to discuss case among selves or other wits, what did LA go to JB's office with, and who reported that? Is he being tailed?

    RH: LA testified to that, it's a mystery.

    NJ: What did he go there for and how did State know?

    BK: All A's subject to recall

    RH: They have all been exempted from sequestration, no one has said they can't talk amongst themselves, but they've all been in courtroom, so??? No rule LA can't talk to lawyers, still question as to how SA found out.

    BK: JA couldn't go into detail with LA bc beyond scope
     
  12. TUSK

    TUSK New Member

    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    thanks for another great show!:great:
     
  13. ynotdivein

    ynotdivein Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    11,425
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Caller: Q about JB asking leading questions and keeping talking

    (missed BK)

    RH: Wit knows what answer should be even when JB rephrases. This underscores his inexperience. JB should know you can lead expert wits, and can also declare wits as hostile bc they are aligned with state.

    Tricia: What is a hostile wit?

    RH: You can question wit using cross exam techniques.

    BK: More leeway to lead them through what you want.
     
  14. TiaM

    TiaM Calm and Watchful Now

    Messages:
    1,746
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    One hour is just not long enough!!!!

    Thank you Tricia, Beth and Richard.

    Kimster great as always.

    Much appreciated.
     
  15. joypath

    joypath Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,619
    Likes Received:
    193
    Trophy Points:
    63
    IIRC: Kathy Reichs declined phone conversations with Baez as she was "on vacation"

    Barry Logan was the person who had not returned Baez's calls regarding the "due date" of the "touch DNA' from his laboratory. HHJP managed to reach the offices of Dr. Logan the next day AND have a "chat" with the individual who preformed the testing procedure (or as Baez would put it PROTOCOL)
     
  16. panthera

    panthera Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    26,409
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Great question, Tricia - asking if CA will be charged with perjury.

    RH: Zero possibility.
     
  17. ynotdivein

    ynotdivein Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    11,425
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Tricia: Is there any chance CA will be charged with perjury

    BK: Highly doubt it. Perjury hard to prove, ppl understand her motivations, perjury not easy to prove. But tenor of LDB cross was certainly to convey to CA and jury that SA not happy with her and jury should take note.

    RH: Zero chance of perjury charge. I 100% think this case will come back on appeal and she will be wit then, if she is being prosecuted for perjury at that time, zero percent she would cooperate at that point if she is being prosecuted for perj
     
  18. RR0004

    RR0004 New Member

    Messages:
    20,001
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can someone in the know figure out why the show cut out for me? Did anyone else have issues? Could it be a geographical thing?
     
  19. panthera

    panthera Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    26,409
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thank you Tricia, Beth and Richard - GREAT show, questions and discussion! :clap: :clap: :clap:
     
  20. 3doglady

    3doglady Certified Coffeeaholic

    Messages:
    3,724
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I remember it the same. MF said that CA told him about the fight and he told LE. LA told JG about the fight too.
     

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice