2011.06.30 TRIAL Day Thirty-two (Afternoon Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aedrys

If justice doesn't get you, karma will.
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
6,719
Reaction score
17
I love how NOW Baez worries about being punished. NOW. After THREE FREAKING YEARS of his carp, he worries NOW about punishment!!!!!!!!

Oh just shoot me!
 

reeseeva

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
1,716
Reaction score
854
God I love how Judge Perry doesn't let Baez tap dance his malarchy to the Court.

Pray!!
 

eleni777

New Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
394
Reaction score
2
Her time cards clearly show she lied. March 14th, she had a PTO day. March 17-21 every single day she had overtime, which she testified that the employees weren't allowed to clock over 8 hours. All the time cards in discovery show overtime. She clearly lied and this needs to come in.

Unless she was committing time card fraud, which is a HUGE issue today. At my place of employment (I'm salaried), we have timecard audits and take training on timecard fraud. It is a big problem at my job. A lot of people fudge on their timecards for YEARS before they are caught.
 

3doglady

Certified Coffeeaholic
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
3,724
Reaction score
0
So JB admitted he knew CA was going to lie on the stand.
 

Farfalla40

New Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2011
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
I don't really agree with the whole "salaried employees can come & go".. EVERY salaried position that I've EVER had, there was always some sort of "time keeping", specifically for the determination of BENEFITS eligibilty..ie health ins, vac/sick time etc... most companies have a specified average amount of hours that are needed to continue to qualify for said benefits..
 

pinkfly

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
1,517
Is HHBP doing all this to have it on record for the appeals process?

Or is this matter really this complicated?

I know DT wants them out but.....
 

Ms.Heather

Active Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
1,496
Reaction score
8
Is this a joke?
CA got on the stand and said that she was making a computer search...

SHE LIED.

Bring in the records. WTH is so difficult. This is what makes my blood boil!
 

Fluffy Puppy

Active Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
1,626
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
Having all of Cindy's testimony stricken could bite the State too.
This is a real problem.

Nah, he is going to let them in. The defense knew she would say they were wrong and the SA didn't.

But I think HJJP is going after the defense, not CA, in his current line of questioning.
 

TiaM

Calm and Watchful Now
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
1,746
Reaction score
0
If they knew of this testimony, why didnt they already HAVE the documents way back when?

EXACTLY!

Why didn't the DT get her work computer records to back up the claims THEY KNEW Cindy was gonna make?

Because they would have had to turn them over to the State that's why. And they didn't want to.

Gotcha testimony - and now they are crying about it.
 

Kenziema

New Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
460
Reaction score
0
Their trying (DT) to sell that salaried employee's have no obligations and can be anywhere at anytime they please, BS, BS, BS! :rolleyes:

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act- that is EXACTLY what being a salaried exempt employee means! If you work even ONE DAY in a 40 hour week, you are required BY LAW to be paid for an entire weeks worth of work. As a salaried exempt employee, you are being paid for your knowledge- not your time. Hence the reason salaried exempt employees are EXEMPT from overtime.
 

mimmy03

New Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
311
Reaction score
0
does anybody know if the anthonys are currently in the courtroom while they are hashing this out?
 

Nova24

New Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2011
Messages
1,069
Reaction score
-8
Uh JB you aren't allowed to put a witness on that you know will be lying on the stand.
 

Kateyes

New Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
829
Reaction score
10
Can you imagine how the jury would feel if this DIDN'T come in, and they DIDN'T convict...then they found this out after the fact....

And that is the exact reason CM and JB are arguing so adamantly to keep this evidence and the rebuttal witnesses out of testimony. JB knows the chance of the jurors finding reasonable doubt is slim to none. They are trying to keep the chance at slim, instead of eliminating it altogether. JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top