- Jun 1, 2011
- Reaction score
I realize that, but they claimed premeditated murder, and carry the burden of proof. They can't just make a claim and hope everyone believes them! And yes, I clearly understand that they can still give 1st degree murder without premeditation, but they couldn't prove murder. I'm tired of posting this actually, and will likely stop posting on the section of the website altogether pretty soon.
If you believe the duct tape and traces of chloroform, sure, but I don't, and it's sounds like the jury didn't either. There was too much conflicting evidence and holes in their theories. MOO
Really? What are all the conflicting evidence and holes? I can't think of one reasonable explanation for the duct tape being on her face that isn't related to either aggravated child abuse or murder. Help me out.