2015.07.06 SMS confirms that CWW was a POI as early as July 6th

Discussion in 'Dr. Teresa Sievers' started by SeesSeas, Oct 8, 2015.

  1. SeesSeas

    SeesSeas FLORIDIAN

    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    622
    Trophy Points:
    113
  2. Loading...


  3. human

    human Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    18,624
    Likes Received:
    361
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Wow! Wow!
     
  4. No it's not

    No it's not that simple

    Messages:
    3,856
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    38
    SMS confirmed CWW was already a POI at the funeral on July 6th (Monday)!! Wow

    -Nin
     
  5. No it's not

    No it's not that simple

    Messages:
    3,856
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    38
    That means there was either a direct/ indirect witness or evidence from the crime scene (prints, DNA,cell phone calls/ messages) leading the investigation into that direction. What else?

    -Nin
     
  6. creepingskills

    creepingskills Verified Attorney

    Messages:
    1,246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Pleasantly surprised he answered the question!
     
  7. concernedmother

    concernedmother Active Member

    Messages:
    6,682
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I wonder what pointed to CWW so quickly?
     
  8. ohreally

    ohreally New Member

    Messages:
    1,382
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Traffic Cameras?
     
  9. SeesSeas

    SeesSeas FLORIDIAN

    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    622
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Could be MS had immediate suspicions about CWW and MS alerted LE.
     
  10. creepingskills

    creepingskills Verified Attorney

    Messages:
    1,246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    IMO, a vehicle pointed to CWW but maybe not very quickly. My guess is the car was rental in the name of someone else and LE tied the renter to CWW. So many traffic cameras.
     
  11. atthelake

    atthelake Former Member

    Messages:
    9,980
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I was just looking at the time line ... and if I recall correctly the crime scene tape went back up on that day, is that correct? The timeline here does not have it posted?? Is that because it is not verified or is that because it is not important?

    Yet he was in town before then.

    may not be important to include on the timeline .. Just noting that it was the same day.
     
  12. creepingskills

    creepingskills Verified Attorney

    Messages:
    1,246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm beating a dead horse, but IMO the only reasonable explanation is traffic cameras led LE to run the plates of a car, comes back as rented in MO, this fact alone might make LE reasonably suspicious about why a car, rented in a random person's name from the victim's husband's home state, was in the area of the murder. CWW becomes POI. LSCO packs for a three day trip to interview renter in MO, and either already knew about the connection to CWW or discovered the renter-CWW connection in MO.
     
  13. mariahc

    mariahc New Member

    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, why was that question ok to answer? Not once, but twice.
     
  14. CoolJ

    CoolJ Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,777
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I do believe July 6th would be around the time that SMS said MS was cooperating.
     
  15. creepingskills

    creepingskills Verified Attorney

    Messages:
    1,246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maybe to float out the very real possibility LSCO had evidence connecting Dr. Sievers' murder to (at least) Missouri or (at most) CWW, already on July 6. IMO it was the former, and since CWW was from Missouri he was a POI at that time. After the funeral, another dot was connected that amounted to probable cause and LSCO went to MO?
     
  16. mariahc

    mariahc New Member

    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just to clarify my point, it would seem to me that responding affirmative to that question holds the potential to throw an informant (MS, someone at the office) under the bus. So cautious on all other responses. It certainly does call for a new review of the timeline.
     
  17. No it's not

    No it's not that simple

    Messages:
    3,856
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    38
    CONFIRMED:

    Marker 2:22
    [video=youtube;T4EZOCpYxN4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4EZOCpYxN4[/video]

    -Nin
     
  18. concernedmother

    concernedmother Active Member

    Messages:
    6,682
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Oh to have been a fly on the wall at TS funeral. CWW was a suspect then. I bet LE wanted to handcuff him then when he was hugging TS sister and letting her cry on his shoulder. Wonder how CWW and MS enteracted?
     
  19. Riversinthedesert

    Riversinthedesert New Member

    Messages:
    540
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Probably like long lost brothers
     
  20. Riversinthedesert

    Riversinthedesert New Member

    Messages:
    540
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    RSBM

    Thanks IQ and I am willing to bet the Sheriff himself was at the funeral and sitting close to CWW since he knew TS personally.
     
  21. Njptjp

    Njptjp New Member

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1

    mark. Had to be
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice