It sounds like the fever spiked and then broke very quickly.Me too. That is a very extremely high fever for anyone, but especially a child.
How long had the child had a 105 temp or had been sick?
Once my child's temp continued to rise, I would have immediately sought care then.
We had this happen to one of our daughters when she was four. We rushed her to the hospital, and they packed her in ice back then. We were both scared to death. It took forever for her fever to break. She didnt even remember being taken to the hospital.
Why would they have to come up with $2500 up front? Surely they had walk in clinics that are very reasonable.
If there was a nonprofit hospital close by they wouldnt turn a child away with 105 temp, imo.
A 105 temp can cause brain damage. A parent cant just sit idly by, and do nothing hoping the fever breaks.
That is child neglect, and child edangerment. Imo.
It's obvious when it even reached 103 and climbing the child needed immediate care then, and to know it kept rising is unexplainable as to why no care was sought.
What if it hadn't broken? What a horrible risk to take.
We would probably reading about another dead child or one possibly with brain damage if the sky high fever didn't break.
That's a risk I don't think many parents would want to take with their child's life.
There has to be much more to this story.
Imo
A couple decided not to take their feverish child to the hospital. Hours later police kicked down their door
On February 25, the mother took her 2-year-old boy to the Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine clinic in Tempe, according to Chandler police records.
It was dinner time. But the toddler’s fever had spiked to over 100 degrees.
Shortly after 6:30 p.m., the mother called the doctor and told her that her toddler no longer had a fever so she wasn’t taking him to the emergency room.
The parents claim that the fever had gone down was later verified by medical records.
Last edited: