As well, what did he take with him when he left? Murphy's hair, victim's blood, anything from that house in his car -- there's no getting around that.
Yes, there must have been something he picked up in the house that he carried out with him unknowingly, even if he was super careful.
Well, if there is no PH, then we won't learn anything on June 26th. If her source is right, they might have done it to maximize their ability to keep things out of the public eye.
Thanks for the post. I was just talking about the OP and your response. Was the witness's (DM's) description provided to LE prior to the identification of BK as suspect? You wanted to know if we could be sure,unless I have misunderstood (?), and I think that the PCA indicates that LE had DM's physical description of the stranger she saw on the night, prior to LE identifying BK as suspect. As to the other questions you raise, I don't think the public know much more at this point. I have no idea how many times LE interviewed the two housemates. All I surmise is that DM made her statement regarding the physical characteristics of the stranger, before BK was suspect. Taking into account the trauma etc, I still think that LE would would have followed through with this ASAP post discovery of the crime. I'm not willing to speculate further at this point as I don't think there are grounds/facts available to do so. MOOHaven't caught up yet, but I agree they were interviewed before the 29th and before LE wrote the PCA.
It seems likely the girls were among those in front of the house "crying while draped in emergency blankets." And most likely, IMHO, they were in no condition to give intensive interviews right away. Which makes perfect sense. So IMHO maybe some basic questions at first and interviews set up for later: probably not much later. And IMHO it seems logical there would be several interviews, varying in depth and time, after that. Several considering that, as far as we know, they were the only two people in the house who survived the attack. I don't recall seeing when or if either girl hired an attorney at any point. I would hope they did, because it seems like LE would have come up with new questions as they found new information. IMHO from what we've seen the girls might have been protected to whatever extent from the media, which also makes sense. But protected or not, and lawyered up or not, it seems unlikely that LE stopped questioning them right up to or after the 29th. IMHO. Thus my curiosity.
Link to girls crying while draped in emergency blankets:
'Senseless acts of violence'
Nov. 15—As Moscow grapples with what the city mayor called "senseless acts of violence" that left four University of Idaho students dead, only a limited amount of details have been released about the case. The Moscow Police Department is investigating the alleged homicide after law enforcement...news.yahoo.com
This is the first I have heard of this. That would really surprise me if this has indeed happened. it doesn't make much sense to me for the prosecutor to have taken this direction.
But cleaned it away MOO.
I see she also added 'story coming soon', but how much can they report on?
I have no experience in all things law, but wouldn't an indictment negate the need for the Prelim?
www.krem.com
Yes that is correct. A preliminary hearing is where the prosecutor shows there is probable cause to move to trial. A Grand Jury establishes that same probable cause. They serve the same purpose. However the Defense has no right to even appear, let alone challenge, anything presented to a Grand Jury.
Guess we're smarter than we thought!
The Arraignment should be in open court.
