@Nila Aella and @Sister Golden Hair, if you're talking about the prosecution's first request for discovery from the defense that is missing from Cases of Interest page then I really do recall that a demand for Alibi defense was NOT part of the State's first request. That's just my memory of it, with all else in this latest request from the State looking about the same. I recall discussions here on the threads not too long ago about if and/or when Defense might have to communicate defense strategy to the State and there was confirmation that one of the few defenses the defendant would have to communicate would be an Alibi Defense. However, time limits would only kick in after arraingment. At that point we were expecting a plea post PH, so no Demand for Alibi Defense could be demanded by the State. Those are my memories FWIW. MOO.Interesting. Do you recall if it was typed in all capital letters then too?
I have seen the prosecution ask this before in cases, but not in all caps. MOO
ETA: Actually in going back through the up arrows I noticed the relevant section of ICR was posted, where it specifies that demand for Alibi Defense comes after Arraignment. BK was not arraigned as such prior to this Indictment?As in he hadn't made a plea?
As to why it is in Upper Case, I haven't thought. Would that be significant? IDK, perhaps others have an idea if it means anything.