The thought of a flashlight is scary to me, because if he was holding one, he could have used it to blind the victims, or even as another weapon. It seems unlikely that he would want something in both hands, although it's just as unlikely he would go into the house without being able to see. If M had her fairy lights on in her room, he probably could see that from the window, and the good vibes and fairy lights in the living room also. Maybe he didn't think he needed any extra light?
I think that X discovered an open slider, one which had just minutes prior been closed... she shut it, set her food down, returned to E and said someone is here...
LE did say in the PCA that X was on Tik Tok at 4:12, so she was most likely awake the entire time. It's so scary to think about. My bet is that the whole thing was much noisier than what the PCA suggests. Even SG said the coroner said it was a "hell of a battle" downstairs.
They can edit. Not the actual live feed but feeds that are uploaded to Youtube for people to watch later on can be downloaded and people can edit to their heart's content. Now-adays someone could also use AI to alter them. Actually, now that I think about it, someone could use AI and create their own feed from footage already available. And people can be very gullible.... They might as well have the cameras. I anticipate that it's going to be a mess either way. Might as well be a mess with one accurate version of events available to everyone.
I watched some of the hearing and the Judge seemed to make a special point of CourtTV's use of commentators and cherry-picking of clips.
While this is true, in video, interpretation it is somewhat left up to the viewer. "In the eye of the beholder", so to speak. When we do not have cameras in the courtroom, the interpretation is left to the point of view/agenda of the reporter, with no way of us, the public, being able to judge for ourselves.
In the USA we call 911.
Exactly and we all know already that some of the writers covering this case have written incorrect information.
Many, I'd say!
My personal opinion is that many of those fight back theories have been (probably unintentionally) inspired by watching action movies. I do think it's important (and by design) that the killer struck during the same early morning hours that Special Forces and SWAT often plan their raids. People are more deeply asleep, reflexes are slower, etc. By the time victim #1 consciously knew they were in trouble, I believe they were already severely injured and probably incapable of fighting back or screaming. At least imo.
Absolutely!
RSBBM. This is exactly where I've been from the beginning. I don't know what BK's motive might have been to go into that house and murder people, but I believe his background interest (possible obsession) in military and LE is significant. JMO. I very much think it looks like he was playing Special Ops the entire time, from the planning all the way to his exit out. I'm likely 100% incorrect, but I think it's possible his motive was the thrill of carrying out a mission like some bad a * *, rather than obsessing over a girl or an ideology. Logically, I think both the latter are much more plausible than my own idea, but I just can't shake it. JMO.
@maskedwoman snipped for focus Good post, agreeing,
This is one example of what I mean when I say I can't stand 'Trial by Tweet. There are always going to inaccuracies in re-reporting the facts. Just like in the Murdaugh (Corey Fleming) case yesterday, first it was 10 year sentence and then corrected to 20 years. But after sooooo many tweets.
