Okay. I knew, way back when, this whole "alibi" thing was mindbogglingly ridiculous. He just keeps amping it up from bad to worse. But I do believe this will (bear with me) be a game changer of sorts. They finally pinned him down into giving some kind of trackable, traceable information, something that can be likely proven or disproven with cellular data and ping analysis. Seriously, that's going to be the end of him because now that they finally forced him into giving some kind (any kind) of particulars, the "results" are either going to be so vague they're useless or they'll actually disprove what he's saying. I don't even have to check them, I already know. Now, I will start dissecting them, I'm already looking at that expert they're producing that says this couldn't have been his vehicle on the Airport Road footage, and I'm looking at everything here. But I've been to the Idaho/Montana/Dakotas area. When I was there, I went to Mount Rushmore. I was at the observation deck. There was so much fog, you could have been in the parking lot of a bowling alley, there'd be no way to know, you couldn't see anything, and that's at Mt Rushmore. The fog out there is unbelievable. And so is this defendant. He's unbelievable, ONLY BK could produce this kind of wacko "defense." MOO.