Goody said:
A lot of us would prefer the killer not be Darlie, but when the evidence points straight at her, it can't be ignored. You say some evidence was held back? Do you know what?
Are you of the mind that Darin did it and Darlie is covering up for him? Or does she not even realize he did it?
Sorry I didnt reply sooner. I havent been on since my last post. If it was Darin, Darlie didn't realize it. Truthfully I think that she was so traumatized, in shock, and yea I do think that she passed out either from lack of oxygen or shock, that she wouldn't have known it was Darin if it had been. She would have no reason to cover for him. Maybe she refuses to believe that it could be him. There are a lot of senerio's that I still see as very plausible, more plausible than suddenly taking a dive off into the deep end and stabbing her kids.
A lot has been said about "overkill" with the boys. I don't see it that way. Devon was only stabbed twice. I do believe he tried to get up which resulted in the second stab wound. He is the one that was the most difficult for Darlie. The rage would have been taken out on him if she'd done it.
Damon, momma's boy, was the one with "overkill", but if you look at it from a different angle it might not have been rage but more because the poor little guy wouldn't die! I think he moved around and was able to fight more, resulting in stab wounds hitting bone, and so many of them.
I have a few different theories, some involving Darin directly or indirectly, and some not.
I have studied the evidence. I have been so intrigued with this case since it happened. SOOO I am certainly not going on Christopher Wayne Browns word. Good grief, where was he going with his ideas? Devon was right handed so he always laid on his right side. What kind of dumb thing is that to say? Everybody knows that in a sleeping state everyone moves multiple times. Not that that is the only stupid thing he said, but that one has always made me cringe, and I have never heard any one else comment on it.
As far as some evidence being held back... I can't remember the exact train of thought I was on when I said that just now. It's not a cop out. lol. I had a stroke when I was 23 (31 now) and it has left me with memory blogs. Sometimes I cant remember where I was going with a thought. hehehe. I do think that LE was just a little too eager to close this case up for publicity sake. I also think that Darlie couldn't have had her trial in a worse spot.
Sometimes what she says and does seems ALL wrong, but then again here I sit in my house, much like the one Darlie lived in, with my two little girls sound asleep upstairs and perfectly safe. I could speculate, but I pray to God that I will never know how I would react.
All in all, I think she needs a new trial in a new area. We have certainly spent tax payers money more poorly in the past and will in the future, so what would it hurt?