Darlies case reminds me ALOT about this case in Illinois parctically the same thing. Julie Rea-Harper and her murdered son Joel. The mother was also convicted, for killing her son in the middle of the night, by stabbing with a steak knife, she also had injuries, where they try to say she inflicted them herself. It is just uncanny the similarites between these two cases. However the exception to the similarites are that this case was then overturned, and she was re-tried and found NOT GUILTY . I beleive there are ties to texas with this case too, I beleive a serial killer from texas came forward and confessed to this crime sells or sellers. I will look into that in a few minutes and post that info. Here is a little bit from their website....CHECK it out www.justiceforjulieandjoel.org The sequence of events as told by Julie has been questioned. Those questioning her feel she should have been killed also. But if the killer were there SOLELY to kill Joel, he wouldn't kill Julie. If he did, who would go to prison? Julie is not responsible for the behavior of the asailant. These same people feel she inflicted her own wounds because she pointed them out to the EMT's. That's ludicrous! Is it too much to expect that a grown woman would be able to tell someone "where it hurts"?