Yesterday, John Douglas made an interesting post on a thread about Patsy Ramsey's deteriorating health:- http://www.johndouglasmindhunter.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1310 One of the things he speaks of in this post is the stress brought on by a murder case. The RST post about the stress of the "BORG" contributing to Patsy's ill health, but one thing I find horrific is the fact that a recent newspaper article by Charlie Brennan had a "friend" (who didn't wish to be named - surprise, surprise) revealing Patsy's poor state of health and her domestic and medical arrangements. What kind of friend is that? I think it's appalling to divulge her private arrangements at a time like this. I think that the stress of having "friends" anonymously leaking stuff to the press must be way more stressful than anything the "BORG" might have to say on an internet forum! Imagine wondering which friend couldn't be trusted? Also, in his post John Douglas says:- I find this puzzling because according to Steve Thomas' book (thanks to Sylvia at FFJ):- So does this mean that Lou SMit wasn't really certain about their innocence when he said he was ...... Or is Douglas wrong? I posed a few questions to John Douglas at his forum but it appears to be a touchy subject there. I am interested to know John Douglas' thoughts on Tom Bennett's statement about the DNA maybe not being the killers and why he thought the Ramseys hadn't been cleared. I'd be really interested to hear his thoughts. However, I won't hold my breath.