Ok I have a question about the 2 alleged sightings. 1. We have sighting number one by Jane Tanner. A friend of the McCanns who has changed her description of the said "person" and what she saw the guy holding even and ..when asked by the Pjs she didnt correctly say where Gerry and Jezx were standing. In addition the two men that were there have both said she wasnt seen .. even though it would IMO have been impossible to miss her. Not witholding the fact also she was wearing flip flops which tend to make a noise. 2. We have sighting number 2 by Martin Smith and his family. These people allegedly have no connection to the McCanns or there friends and therefore have no reason to lie. Martin Smith alleges he saw a guy down by the beach holding a child that appeared to be sleeping. He wasnt entirely sure of the time. After seeing pictures of Gerry walking down the runway at East Midlands he contacted police and told them that the man he had seen with the child down by the beach resembled Gerry McCann. Mr Smith was due to go to Portugal about this to see Mr Amaral however..Amaral was taken off .. So we have two "witnesses". One with every reason to lie..and one with no one reason to lie. So why is it only appeals are put out for the person seen by Jane Tanner and not the one seen by Martin Smith? Why are they trying to pretend that that sighting didnt happen? Surely if they want people to come forward..they would appeal for the man Smith to see to come forward also wouldnt they if only so they can eliminate him? Why...as members of the public..is it important for us to believe Tanner over Smith? Wouldnt Smith come over as more credible? They are there now to do a reconstruction...why not have Martin Smith there? Questions questions .. .