snooptroop88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2024
- Messages
- 1,061
- Reaction score
- 8,740
TOTALLY agreed. D can't prove their Odinite theory, how can they "know" it happened that way?? They do seem to desperately hope WE will think it happened this way. I don't want to speculate about what goes on in the heads of the D, but they clearly cannot prove their Franks theory, moo. And in the same breath that they are demonstrating they cannot prove it happened in the elaborately mapped-out way they describe, they are castigating anyone who dares to advance the process of putting forth legitimate speculation about their own client, who has been charged with the crime.The Franks Motion Quadruplets are not fact. They are opinion coupled with the defense’s fabricated scenario on what they think happened. The footnotes contain words like “perhaps, maybe, we’re not saying it happened this way, but it mighta could have, etc”.
Why can’t we have a trial and hear the State’s side of things and what they’ve got. Let’s have sworn witnesses, and cross examinations and dueling experts. We can’t because the Judge has destroyed everything by congratulating her granddaughter on winning a softball tournament.
Wouldn't the D's tactics of publicly naming people other than their own client and tying those individuals in a very pointed way to this heinous crime-- wouldn't that be the more glaring example of vigilantism? They're essentially moving into the territory/roles of LE and the state prosecutor in what they've been trying to do, JMO. A quasi-investigation. They are acting in a role that is outside of their usual purview, moo, and acting like they've come up with "the real story."
And by the way, I think RA's guilty. <modsnip>
Last edited by a moderator: