INfisherman
I won’t be doing that again
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2024
- Messages
- 464
- Reaction score
- 7,228
RSBMI'm simply saying the information was misleading.
Thought about it & couldn’t the exact same information be presented (as it was in trial) in reverse order & have a completely different effect? It’s all in how it’s presented & worded. Directing the narrative. Now I see why so many content creators who happen to be lawyers are jumping on the bandwagon.
You trial lawyers are slick little weasels LOL (completely kidding), I’ll stop.
I’ve noticed how some questions are directed such that it’s almost forcing a yes or no sort of response. Sly. Doesn’t give a witness the chance to mess up the gameplan, so to speak, so there are no surprises introduced via their testimony, no?
I wouldn’t make a good witness under cross - where words are being put into my mouth. I’ve seen that quite a bit or subtle attempts at it at various times.
The one that really stuck out was Baldwin slamming down hundreds of pages of interview records & telling Mullin to find a specific answer. I’d have kindly handed it back & asked if he had a paralegal to bookmark his evidence. Probably wouldn’t have gone over too well.
JMO
ETA clarity via formatting
Last edited: