Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah - wasn’t sure how to word it, hence the quotes. Thanks for the clarification.Neither the daughter or step-sister gave character evidence. Whether or not they were abused by RA is a fact question and used as impeachment evidence to discredit the notion that he did.
The phone IMO is not a big mystery. I feel like in this case some people want to complicate every single thing because it was unsolved for 5 1/2 years. It gave everyone time to come up with so many scenarios about maybe this happened and maybe it was that. Then the defense team comes along and adds even more fictional stories with their Franks memos that became public. It then fueled all these theories and fanned the flames.The phone thing does bother me. The girls could not have been moved but the phone could have been. If it was turned off then moved to a stationary location, turned back on in airplane mode and tampered with and then returned to the crime scene. I am in no way saying this happened but it has been debated in the past why the killer left the phone there. I still think RA is the killer most likely.
Nobody put headphones into this phone because WHY? If someone cant get into it and we have no record that anyone tried to access the phone after 2:32, why would that put headphones in and take them out? Then they did nothing. If it was one of the victims then why? Where did the headphones go?
Water could evaporate especially, underneath the recently unalived body of child.For me the questions are about why did it happen around 6 pm when the water was supposed to happen to the phone around 2:30 and how did water or dirt clear itself?
This is an excellent point @justtrish ! I have for so long wondered why the phone wasn’t taken. I had only considered that the killer overlooked it. Fear of tracking would explain it.Why would the killer then take the phone away from the crime scene because then what happens is HE is being tracked by the victims phone.
Perhaps a change in ambient temperature, Abby's body would certainly have cooled during that time-frame, and the surrounding air and earth would have cooled, or changes to do with condensation. I'm not a scientific type but I imagine there were ongoing changes in the environment at that time and beyond.For me the questions are about why did it happen around 6 pm when the water was supposed to happen to the phone around 2:30 and how did water or dirt clear itself?
If it got wet around 2:25 then it seems much more likely that it began drying out enough by 6 that this is what caused that. It's just not believable that a person is in the woods at 6pm doing something with headphones. They can't access the phone, the phone shows ZERO movement at that point, nobody tries to access the phone so really WHY would someone return to mess with a phone while people are literally out in full force yelling for the girls.. by 6pm a search was very clearly going on for them.For me the questions are about why did it happen around 6 pm when the water was supposed to happen to the phone around 2:30 and how did water or dirt clear itself?
I hate that that is the case but It seems that would make it not evaporate.Water could evaporate especially, underneath the recently unalived body of child.
Perhaps a change in ambient temperature, Abby's body would certainly have cooled during that time-frame, and the surrounding air and earth would have cooled, or changes to do with condensation. I'm not a scientific type but I imagine there were ongoing changes in the environment at that time and beyond.
That makes sense, but when the temperature cools condensation happens. Like in the fall and spring in the morning dew happens.Perhaps a change in ambient temperature, Abby's body would certainly have cooled during that time-frame, and the surrounding air and earth would have cooled, or changes to do with condensation. I'm not a scientific type but I imagine there were ongoing changes in the environment at that time and beyond.
RA himself said.. he watched Dateline. Many of us do, but the fact he said that in the interview is interesting. Most of us that watch shows like Dateline at least get a brief overview of many criminal cases and if a phone was tracked that is certainly mentioned. If a phone is what catches the killer that is definately talked about. I think it would be something then that RA had common knowledge about. He gives his phone to DD and that phone isn't on the trail, but he says he was using that phone while he was walking so that is a clue that he didn't bring it because he knew it could be tracked. People now know that their phones can track them and if you are planning this out, which clearly the killer did because their phone wasn't there.. (even if it isn't RA).. so stands to reason to me that the killer wouldn't want to mess with the victims phone either. I wish he would have because that would have tracked him.This is an excellent point @justtrish ! I have for so long wondered why the phone wasn’t taken. I had only considered that the killer overlooked it. Fear of tracking would explain it.
jmo
True, but the dirt or water clearing in such a short time doesn't make sense either. Especially when people have to look up how to clear it on Google.If it got wet around 2:25 then it seems much more likely that it began drying out enough by 6 that this is what caused that. It's just not believable that a person is in the woods at 6pm doing something with headphones. They can't access the phone, the phone shows ZERO movement at that point, nobody tries to access the phone so really WHY would someone return to mess with a phone while people are literally out in full force yelling for the girls.. by 6pm a search was very clearly going on for them.
That he himself said he did and now the jury has that information, both sides to weigh.Neither the daughter or step-sister gave character evidence. Whether or not they were abused by RA is a fact question and used as impeachment evidence to discredit the notion that he did.
Conspiracy theory hat on: to stop it ringing out loud and alerting search parties to the location. That actually would be pretty smart - since the phone was locked and couldn't be put into airplane mode to stop calls coming to it.Nobody put headphones into this phone because WHY? If someone cant get into it and we have no record that anyone tried to access the phone after 2:32, why would that put headphones in and take them out?
Yeah it might not have been water as in immersion, but just a bit of condensation in the socket - i've had this issue personally a lot with jogging in bad conditions - easy to get a tiny bit of condensation or splatter in your buds and they go on the fritz
MOO