GUILTY Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #216

Status
Not open for further replies.
IMO they were going for a hung jury. They had no hope of a NG verdict

Hence why they spread so many crazy stories pretrial

MOO
The defense just seemed very disorganized & other than the arguments over treatment in Westville & mental states, the rest was just not overly impactful to me. I wasn’t 100% convinced of guilt until 2-3 days into the defense’s turn at bat. The reported overreactions to certain evidence didn’t do anything to win me over either.

ETA clarity, It/The defense JMO
 
Last edited:
Thank you! I saw reporting (from a lawyer actually) that said otherwise. I think this might be the phase where he was medicated (not sure if the trial presented the dates for his anti-psychotic treatment). If he actually thought he'd killed his family, then that's a false confession. If he thought it was figurative, then it's not.

I have no clue what the appellate court will do with all this. Just wish it was tied up a bit better.

Oh, and that article gave good detail on what Wala thought was going on (brief psychosis, no catatonia or delusions). So she must have regarded his statement about "killing family and friends" as metaphorical and not delusional. That's a plus.

IMO
BBM

Many followers wish that much of the trial was reported on more completely. Any loose ends are likely attributed to all the restrictions put in place on the media. I’m assuming we’ve gotten most of the more important aspects of the testimony.

Can’t speculate as to what may or may not occur with appeals. They do have points of contention but we’ll just have to wait & see if the appellate agrees or not.
 
Last edited:
If you know me and my posts in this case you know I have zero doubts RA is the killer. My point was IF RA actually suffers from a mental health disorder, that disorder may have played into him WRONGLY putting his confidence in his legal counsel.

JMO you may be correct in all of the above. Which is why my post stated IF. Meaning it was speculation. MOO we've had enough dissent in this case and its threads over the years. It is counter productive for those of us who feel a just verdict was delivered to argue amongst ourselves about the minutia. MOO We don't have to agree but I actually think we agree about more than we don't.

ETA I have never heard a recording of Richard Allen's voice either and would very much like to. I think after the gag order is lifted beyond the December sentencing date, we will get to hear the LE interviews done with him in October of 2022 and maybe some of the phone calls from prison. At least I am hoping we will.
Very good points. I agree and didn't mean to sound as if I disagreed. There's still a lot we don't know about this guy. That's understandable as the judge needed to have the gag order in place to protect the case. I hope we learn a little more about him, at least enough to get an idea of what motivated him to do this.
 
Thank you! I saw reporting (from a lawyer actually) that said otherwise. I think this might be the phase where he was medicated (not sure if the trial presented the dates for his anti-psychotic treatment). If he actually thought he'd killed his family, then that's a false confession. If he thought it was figurative, then it's not.

I have no clue what the appellate court will do with all this. Just wish it was tied up a bit better.

Oh, and that article gave good detail on what Wala thought was going on (brief psychosis, no catatonia or delusions). So she must have regarded his statement about "killing family and friends" as metaphorical and not delusional. That's a plus.

IMO
I also took this as him saying his actions have essentially killed his family. He would not be with them anymore. He said this also. He wanted to make sure they were together in the afterlife. He found God and was concerned how his family felt about him. We miss a lot by not being able to see and hear the testimony for ourselves. Some that have reported on this have taken some of these statements and not provided context for what was said. They want to push the narrative that he was not well and was confessing to things that didn't happen because it supports their already decided narrative that he only confessed because he was locked up. IMO
 
It was apparently decided pre-trial. The defense had all the confessions on their list of evidence, the prosecution had 7.

The obviously false confessions are evidence that goes to the infamous false confession defense.
A lot of jurors (who never heard the discussion about which were to be admitted) would want to hear a smattering.

There are several areas where this could result in an appeal that at least goes above state appellate court. Another one has to do with planting someone in the cell next to him, etc.

I do think he will likely stay convicted in that particular region, with that particular set of appellate judges, but it would have been to his advantage in making the false confession defense.

If his defense team doesn't bring it up on appeal, then I think they are incompetent (which is another possible appeal).

And then of course, there's the fact that he was kept alone in a lit cell for 13 months (said the prison psychologist on the stand).


Apparently the composite pictures (based on witnesses near the bridge that day and on the photo) were not allowed into evidence either.
BBM


Rozzi asked about his cell conditions and said the lights were always on. Wala told the court she believed he could dim them.

https://fox59.com/delphi-trial/i-ju...unt-of-delphi-murders-to-prison-psychologist/



Diener asked if Westcott was aware Allen could dim the lights.


 
Very good points. I agree and didn't mean to sound as if I disagreed. There's still a lot we don't know about this guy. That's understandable as the judge needed to have the gag order in place to protect the case. I hope we learn a little more about him, at least enough to get an idea of what motivated him to do this.
I just didn't want you to think I was in any way defending him or his awful actions. Because we agree on his guilt. I too really hope at some point we get to better understand his motivations.
 
It's very troubling, though. The whole situation with him confessing to crimes he did not commit (because the people he says he murdered are very much still alive) should have been allowed for the defense, rather than using just the incriminating confessions.

I say this, because it's an obvious area for a successful appeal. An appellate court is going to read all 61 and have some serious legal questions about the defense being denied that in evidence.

IMO.

I doubt it.
What situation was the defense denied? The opportunity to say RA said a few times he was innocent? Probably at least 98% of all inmates and accused say the same thing. Hardly compelling. Hardly news.
Confessing 61+ times, that’s a lot of red flags.
The defense attempted to argue that RA was crazy when he made the confession but they couldn’t. They had no answer for the confessions he made with information only the killer would know. “Psychosis does not make someone psychic”, wise words from Aine Cain of the Murder Sheet.


 
IMO they were going for a hung jury. They had no hope of a NG verdict

Hence why they spread so many crazy stories pretrial

MOO
Wish they'd have counseled him to just plead guilty and save everyone in Abby & Libby's family the emotional and mental torture of sitting through this horrific trial and save the state tons of $. Better still, I wish he'd have just confessed from the get-go 7 1/2 years ago so the family didn't have to suffer for this long waiting and not knowing.

jmo
 
I also took this as him saying his actions have essentially killed his family. He would not be with them anymore. He said this also. He wanted to make sure they were together in the afterlife. He found God and was concerned how his family felt about him. We miss a lot by not being able to see and hear the testimony for ourselves. Some that have reported on this have taken some of these statements and not provided context for what was said. They want to push the narrative that he was not well and was confessing to things that didn't happen because it supports their already decided narrative that he only confessed because he was locked up. IMO
He killed everything possibly good in his own life and so many others lives as well as Abby and Libby.
 
Oh, and that article gave good detail on what Wala thought was going on (brief psychosis, no catatonia or delusions). So she must have regarded his statement about "killing family and friends" as metaphorical and not delusional. That's a plus.

Hi 10.
Most of us who’ve been following believe he was speaking figuratively when he said he killed his family.

This opinion was formed for several reasons, but as to Dr. Wala, there are links way way back in the threads that she did NOT call LE or request a welfare check on his family. @steeltowngirl provided you with one, as you acknowledged.

Therefore many of us concluded that Wala did indeed see his statement as not literally true, and in context of speaking of his family he seemed to be alluding to how he’d “killed” them as an intact family.

JMO but based on the evidence presented in court and on the transcripts.

ETA: I know you have expertise in DNA.
One of the defense’s points was that RA’s DNA was not present. Yet NOBODY’S DNA was found at all, so that’s another reason RA could not be excluded.
Clearly someone (RA) killed them yet left no DNA. I’m curious if you can interpret that for me (in layman’s terms). TY
 
Last edited:
It was apparently decided pre-trial. The defense had all the confessions on their list of evidence, the prosecution had 7.

The obviously false confessions are evidence that goes to the infamous false confession defense.
A lot of jurors (who never heard the discussion about which were to be admitted) would want to hear a smattering.

There are several areas where this could result in an appeal that at least goes above state appellate court. Another one has to do with planting someone in the cell next to him, etc.

I do think he will likely stay convicted in that particular region, with that particular set of appellate judges, but it would have been to his advantage in making the false confession defense.

If his defense team doesn't bring it up on appeal, then I think they are incompetent (which is another possible appeal).

And then of course, there's the fact that he was kept alone in a lit cell for 13 months (said the prison psychologist on the stand).


Apparently the composite pictures (based on witnesses near the bridge that day and on the photo) were not allowed into evidence either.
Where are you seeing that confessions were not allowed to be admitted? The defense wouldn’t be able to admit his confessions in the first place, as it would be hearsay - the defendant is available to testify, he just doesn’t want to. They can’t do an end run around opening him up to cross by admitting out of court statements he made.

Regardless, the defense tried to keep the state from presenting some of the confessions, not the other way around - this is what your own source said, as well.

JMO
 
The Jury made the best decision with the information they were given, but it still doesn't mean they got the best expert opinions to make the outcome they had. I bet this gets appealed.

It will be appealed as most murder convictions are and it will most likely fail.
The jury came to their conclusion because the prosecution experts testifying in detail showing that the cartridge at the crime scene had cycled through RA’s gun, among other things. The defense experts failed to prove otherwise.
The defense team was responsible for finding experts that might help their cause. They couldn’t do it.
 
Just a thought. Might police have been alerted to Allen earlier when he had his suicide attempt at home? I take it LE attended??

I wonder if because he was on the System as Richard Allen Whiteman it didn't flag up.
But a guy that admitted to being on the trails during the murders and then making suicide attempts a time after may well have triggered suspicions?
Obviously too late now.
 
Just a thought. Might police have been alerted to Allen earlier when he had his suicide attempt at home? I take it LE attended??

I wonder if because he was on the System as Richard Allen Whiteman it didn't flag up.
But a guy that admitted to being on the trails during the murders and then making suicide attempts a time after may well have triggered suspicions?
Obviously too late now.
That’s assuming he was ever put into "the system" by then, assuming you’re referring to the 2019 call from KA. KS testified the tip sheet was marked cleared & she was in the process of entering info into a database. It seems logical the entire box of tips had yet to be entered into the db.
 
Just a thought. Might police have been alerted to Allen earlier when he had his suicide attempt at home? I take it LE attended??

I wonder if because he was on the System as Richard Allen Whiteman it didn't flag up.
But a guy that admitted to being on the trails during the murders and then making suicide attempts a time after may well have triggered suspicions?
Obviously too late now.
MOO it didn't flag up because someone with authorrity marked it "clear."
Otherwise they would have been looking high and low for
Mr. "Whiteman."
 
well, IF RA genuinely suffers DPD, Baldwin may have become his "person" since his incarceration. RA would need someone to caretake him and KA can't do it while he is locked up. Transference to Baldwin could be a "thing". SO yeah, Baldwin is mommy now. It would make sense. Makes me wonder all the more if RA, given his druthers, would have preferred to plead guilty but his reliance on Baldwin guiding and caretaking him prevented that, and instead based his decision making on based on what AB wanted.
well yeah perhaps maybe possibly??

or

The oldest trick in a defence playbook.
Making the charged defendant APPEAR as meek, week and useless as visually possible.

perhaps maybe possibly?? ;)
 
well yeah perhaps maybe possibly??

or

The oldest trick in a defence playbook.
Making the charged defendant APPEAR as meek, week and useless as visually possible.

perhaps maybe possibly?? ;)
it's anyone's guess IMO, I really hope after the gag is lifted a lot of what the jury saw becomes public for us to review.
 
it's anyone's guess IMO, I really hope after the gag is lifted a lot of what the jury saw becomes public for us to review.
true

Just my opinion, it was a clear textbook play for sympathy.
The on off switch of dependance and sensibility was not lost on me.

Yes it will be a great thing for it all to come out.
Although Im not expecting any bombshells.
Just more incriminating/ redflags against Allen
moo
 
For me what makes me feel guilty is the correct verdict was there were so many coincidences RA needed to explain away. Plus his confession that made a highly plausible scenario. Yet the defence teams "what ifs" while semi plausible as standalones were all hyper specific and didn't come together for a coherent alternative. Then came the plea for sympathy. JMO that if that strategy was their best shot at clearing him, they knew he was cooked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
119
Guests online
321
Total visitors
440

Forum statistics

Threads
615,148
Messages
18,330,665
Members
236,564
Latest member
beavskii
Back
Top