Discussion in 'Caylee Anthony 2 years old' started by The World According, Mar 4, 2010.
I have saved two of their voicemails.
What bothers me even further now is that it appears the defense has used up its allowable billing hours for in-state private investigators. So are all these PIs also working pro bono?
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5841865&postcount=109"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Invoice for the Defense for Work Performed[/ame]
Well, I wasn't aware of any of those rules. Honestly, I'm not sure exactly what was said. We aren't from that area however, I'm pretty sure he knew Suburban from the other areas we searched.
Now I'm disturbed by this. He showed up just a couple days later, unannounced. I don't think I'll post on this publicly anymore.
I totally understand!
Of course! But, you're level-headed...not all folks are hot-wired the same way. KWIM
Then...we might have to add JW to the bunch as well. I don't know this woman from Adam, but what I've seen of her "online" presence leads me to believe that they may have been cut from the same cloth. Doesn't make what she did right, just want her to go away. This circus has gone on long enough.
Geez, I hope somebody will remember to get a picture of him!
Here is a link to the Order for you to read so you are aware of what the Defense was granted by the Judge in regards to TES searchers.
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hi...cuments in Possession of Texas Equusearch.pdf
I don't blame you Fay.
You, or I should say your husband, is not alone.
There have been other TES searchers (who are also WS members) who have been called and some have also received visits from the PI.
They have posted their experiences in this thread starting on or around page 50 if you wish to read what they had to say.
I always enjoy your posts. I know you didn't just fall off the turnip truck. What I do not know is how any news reporter could run with that headline.
The reporter should have asked what happened to the remaining 130 you had last week of Mr. Mason. I was commenting on how ridiculous the defense is with this nonsense, not at all about you friend!!!!!!
To answer your question, I can only speak for myself, when I read that headline, I just rolled my eyes and laughed. Aloud.
As I refresh my memory and review the Motion in Limine to Introduce Prior bad acts.....I am struck by a few particular statements made by the defense......
My comments in red.
pg 25 of 40
The Money Motive
"that Mr. Kronk may have been involved at least in the moving of the remains to the location where they were ultimately found."
This reminds me about how the Anthony's "delayed" bonding KC out. Additionally, I recall the "slip" where Cindy stated if the remains were found while KC was in jail that would prove someone else did it. It is interesting that the defense holds firm to the remains having been moved....yet they instructed Dominic NOT to call 911 if he found anything. IMO it is a simple tie in to Dominic's invisi act, non payment by the Baez firm for services rendered, and prayers that touch DNA will show ANYONE else but KC.
"they could have picked up on the indications of Mr. Kronk's monetary interest in being right about the location of the remains of Caylee Anthony."
Is that kind of like the photo deal to sell the pics of Caylee in the Big Trouble t-shirt????? Which "COINCIDENTALLY" was the one found with the remains.
"Kronk's statement to his son exposes him to a liability for , at a minimum, obstructing an investigation and misleading investigators."
Like statements made by GA and CA thus far that have been shown as "incorrect"??? Remember Cindy's comment.... "A liar does not make a murderer."
"Mr. Kronk gave inconsistent and conflicting answers when questioned about, among other things..."
Like the name of Caylee's birth father??? Her job at Universal??? Her blackjack????? Her nanny????
Now suspects are villains?????
If you have 32 plus people who were actually assigned to Surburban Drive who say there was water in that area where the remains were found and CM is saying he has maybe 10 to 12 people who were not assigned who may or may not be able to say there was water there......seems to me they are waiting on background checks for these people. At this point if someone said they checked out that exact area and their were no remains at that time there would have been a press conference. If anyone had a smiggen of info they'd have a written statement from them on the 6pm news. They're still fishing. jmo
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4794701&postcount=197"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Legal Questions for Our VERIFIED Lawyers[/ame]
We heard this from the judge too, no one has to speak to these PI s if they do not wish to, unless it is in a depo or at trial. You certainly do not have to invite them in if they show up on your door step.
The truly ridiculous thing about the TES mess Baez and the Defense have created - is they forget one major point which I believe the SA will blast them for at trial.
Tim Miller and his searchers WANTED DESPERATELY to find Caylee's remains. This wasn't anyone trying to hide anything or cover anything up. Tim and his people were NOT there against ICA, they were there FOR Caylee and nothing would have made them happier than to bring her remains home like he has done so many times before. Tim does not have an agenda - ( unlike DC) there was nothing in it for him to say there was water where she was found. He didn't want water there. TES spent thousands of their own dollars doing that search. What other motive would/could Tim have to call off the search but standing water at the site?
It's not as if he was some unknown yahoo out there with a crew looking for a little publicity and glory. :banghead: :furious::furious::furious:
If you do not have information for defense you tell them so, no I was not on Surburban and no I don't have information for you....we are done. Then you shut the door. jmo
Good post. Not like they set up a tent with a donation jar and then did nothing.
Murder Docket Updated 2:
12/01/2010 Motion for Additional Hours of Investigation
And here it is. Doesn't mention TES, but we all know what it's for.
Great post, logicalgirl, ITA! I think the defense is treading on seriously thin ice with the whole TES fiasco. They're forgetting how this will all play out in front of a jury. Wait until the prosecution starts asking Tim how and why he got started in searches, how and why he founded TES and dedicated his entire life to finding missing people, and how the family and casey are unlike anyone he's ever encountered who was legitimately looking for a loved one. Tim Miller is "The Good Guy". You never attack the good guy. It will only make casey look worse, if that's possible.
Didn't HHJP say no more hours without a complete accounting of what was done with the previously granted hours?
New Casey Witnesses Come With Doubt, Cost
Defense Team Uses Up Investigative Hours Finding New 'Key' Witnesses
Video Report: http://www.wesh.com/video/25977110/detail.html
""I highly doubt he found anybody who was in that exact spot and until he presents a witness list under oath, I'm very questionable of anything he claims," Hornsby said.
Mason said he plans to present the new witness list to Perry on Friday."