Hi everyone, This is my first post but I have been following all the discussion for quite a while and feel I know you well. I am a local (Brookfield) and feel very strongly about the case. There seems to be a conflict between intent and action in Gerard wanting Allison to be found for insurance purposes, but supposedly hiding her in bushland where she wouldn’t be found (but luckily was due to the heavy rain). My suggestion based on the personalities 1. Gerard intentionally does the deed as semi-planned, then realises it is harder to move Allison/work out what to do than he thought, rings NBC "Dad, dad, help we had an argument and I accidentally killed her!" 3. NBC rushes to help, takes over, and suggests the bushland where he thinks she won't be found 4. GBC goes along with this as he doesn’t want to tell NBC it was intentional even though he now realises she may not be found in a hurry and he may not cash in on insurance in a hurry. 2. When Allison is found due to rain he is semi-relieved as now he can ring insurance company and claim without telling his Father it was intentional. Apparently psychopaths (it has been suggested on this forum that certain people resemble this mental state) are great at a big grandiose plan but forget about the small details or follow on plans (sounds like my boss actually). It’s great to feel I am offiicial, I was looking around at the Cricket Day wondering which of you were from WS.