Just to go back to the theory of Makaras.
This theory has to be close to what has happened, regardless of which adult may have answered the phone, doesn't it?
For some reason it has been disallowed, but we all know it happened, so the only explanation is that it involves the girls, and we know it occurred in the middle of the night, and it was received by Nigels phone, but not necessarily Nigel.
Regardless of what was said, and to which adult, the adult concerned is obviously admitting the girls rang, but denying that there was a problem, or surely that would have led to further investigation, as to why they were worried, why they were alone, or whatever the problem was.
What is to show that the adults involved have not lied through their teeth?
Why is something like this discarded before a jury gets to hear about it, and decide for themselves?
Please know, I am really trying not to discuss the girls here, its just that on the other end of the phone there was an adult, and that adult knows something, or certainly MAY know more than they have disclosed to this point.
They are also in a position where there is a good chance they have not told the truth, because they are related to the accused.
What is not answerable by THEM (not the girls)? It seems like the issue is finished but I cant see why??
Am I not thinking right here?? PLEASE shut me down if you can see the sense in this.