CaseClosed
Registered User
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Messages
- 2,429
- Reaction score
- 2
WOW CC I WANT WHAT YOU'RE HAVING
GIMMI SOME OF THAT!
lease:
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh: ... I have 5 days off work!!!! :great:
WOW CC I WANT WHAT YOU'RE HAVING
GIMMI SOME OF THAT!
lease:
Yes CC, that's what I think too. It should be on the sum of the evidence as a whole. It's just the reasonable doubt thing. It's very subjective don't you think?
Oh good. I'm a very reasonable person lol. Most of the time. May not be quite so reasonable towards the end of school holidays. Lol.
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh: ... I have 5 days off work!!!! :great:
For instance, if the COD can't be determined and her suiciding can't be ruled out as a result would that be reasonable doubt that gbc killed her?
Recent article in the courier mail about the attorney general of Qld looking at some changes to our criminal legal system. Our Chief Justice says he believes judges should be able to explain to juries the meaning of beyond reasonable doubt.
http://www.news.com.au/national-new.../story-fndo4ckr-1226597690808?from=public_rss
Aliens abducting her, probing her for hours and gaining much needed scientific data for a future invasion, and then dropping her at Kholo Creek cant be ruled out 100%. But is it reasonable? Is suicide a reasonable alternative explanation that suits the facts of this case? Is walking 14km (unseen, mind you) and jumping off a bridge a reasonable explanation given the circumstances (scratches with all the hallmarks of fingernails on husbands face, extra-marital affairs, googling self-incrimination before calling police, not going to search HQ while wife is missing, trying to collect insurance before positive ID, botanical matter from yard in Allisons hair, dire financial situation, blood traces in third row of car seats, screams heard from neighbours, lack of suicide note, Allison's unending love for her daughters and the FACT that she would never leave them)?
No, the lack of COD does not lead to reasonable doubt.
Aliens abducting her, probing her for hours and gaining much needed scientific data for a future invasion, and then dropping her at Kholo Creek cant be ruled out 100%. But is it reasonable? Is suicide a reasonable alternative explanation that suits the facts of this case? Is walking 14km (unseen, mind you) and jumping off a bridge a reasonable explanation given the circumstances (scratches with all the hallmarks of fingernails on husbands face, extra-marital affairs, googling self-incrimination before calling police, not going to search HQ while wife is missing, trying to collect insurance before positive ID, botanical matter from yard in Allisons hair, dire financial situation, blood traces in third row of car seats, screams heard from neighbours, lack of suicide note, Allison's unending love for her daughters and the FACT that she would never leave them)?
No, the lack of COD does not lead to reasonable doubt.
Was browsing the internet jobs and found this:
http://www.seek.com.au/Job/casual-cook/in/brisbane-western-suburbs-ipswich/24240628
:jail:
That made me laugh!
Some people have been convicted without a body, which IMO is THE most important evidence that someone is dead. I think it is the SUM of all evidence that makes it or breaks it.
If GBC had no scratches, bruises, etc. and if he had gone to work that morning and not reported her missing until that evening, maybe I would be inclined to consider that perhaps he had nothing to do with it, but all the inconsistencies and evidence we have seen so far is enough to convince me ... and I could be the average joe bloke being called to Jury Duty for this case. IMO.
CaseClosed, imagine if one of us was called for jury duty, there are are many of us it could happen. Imagine the questions... "Do you have an opinion on the gult or non guilt of this defendant?" Yep, I'm a member of websleuths and I believe he is guilty! Challenged! Sorry Marly if this is not ok, not disparaging WS at all, just surmising.
:floorlaugh:
That, and all the talk about Aliens I might go have another glass of wine.