Allison Baden-Clay - GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD #48

Status
Not open for further replies.

SoSueMe

Former Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
8,119
Reaction score
41
Thank you for joining Websleuths! :welcome3:​



Please remember the following when discussing the Allison Baden-Clay case:
Websleuths is a moderated forum. We strive to discuss cases in a friendly environment.

Our rules can be reviewed here: The Rules (PLEASE make sure you know the rules!)


Gerard Bayden-Clay has been arrested and charged with the murder of Allison Bayden-Clay


Thread 1

Thread 2

Thread 3

Thread 4

Thread 5

Thread 6

Thread 7

Thread 8

Thread 9

Thread 10


Thread 11

Thread 12

Thread 13

Thread 14

Thread 15

Thread 16

Thread 17

Thread 18

Thread 19

Thread 20

Thread 21

Thread 22

Thread 23

Thread 24

Thread 25

Thread 26

Thread 27

Thread 28

Thread 29

Thread 30

Thread 31

Thread 32

Thread 33

Thread 34

Thread 35

Thread 36

Thread 37

Thread 38

Thread 39

Thread 40

Thread 41

Thread 42

Thread 43

Thread 44

Thread 45

Thread 46

Thread 47

Bail Hearing Documents


REMEMBER: No cutting and pasting of comments from other social or media websites. You may paraphrase and provide a link.

The only social media sites allowed are those belonging to the victim, Gerard Baden-Clay and any named (by law enforcement) POI or Suspect, or site created and devoted to the murder of Allison.


Media/Timeline Reference Thread: CLICK HERE
 
A list of our verified posters can be found here...

Verified Professional Posters
If your not on our list and would like to be verified please contact Admin at the address below, its all confidential.
If you do not wish to be identified as an expert in a certain area, we ask that you refrain from answering questions that are specifically directed to those that have been verified as specialist in their area and that you do not claim to be a professional in any area.
If a member posts with "expertise" please check to make sure they are on this list. If not, please do not take their post as professional information, but rather just as another opinion ;much as you would with any member of the general posting membership.

If a member wants to post as a professional ( a lawyer, shrink, and so on) or as an insider who knows the people involved then they must email us at the following email.
wsverify@xmission.com
Please include:
The case
Their Websleuths name
Their phone number and a good time to call
Their real name.
In the subject line please put which case they are asking to be verified on.

All info will be kept strictly confidential
Thank you!

ANYONE who posts facts and IS NOT a verified professional MUST POST A LINK TO VERIFY THE INFORMATION!

Any post without this procedure will result in the post being removed without explanation and repeated violations could result in a loss of posting privileges.
 
Allison Baden-Clay case
itsthevibe verified insider
Squizzey1 is a verified insider
XyzQuestions is a verified insider
redlightthroughpaper is a verified insider

Physician
DrWatson is a Thoracic and Vascular Surgeon

Law
alioop is a verified attorney (solicitor)
nowvoyager is a verified attorney (solicitor)

Neuroscience
PlainJaneDoe is a verified expert in neuroscience
 
Could someone tell me the date of the trial please?
 
Could someone tell me the date of the trial please?

Estelle, the trial was initially set down for Monday 9 June but as it turns out the 9th is a public holiday so the trial will commence on Tuesday 10 June.
 
Thinking of Allison today. 2 years since that fateful night.
 
I hate to be gruesome, but I read the autopsy report, and one thing really concerns me about it. The tip of a rubber glove was found in Allison's jumper. From the autopsy report, it was assumed it was from one of the SES or police who helped move her body when she was found. It seems to me that it was just written off. Surely there would have only been a few people involved, and a match could have been made to the brand of gloves the SES or police were wearing? JMO
 
I hate to be gruesome, but I read the autopsy report, and one thing really concerns me about it. The tip of a rubber glove was found in Allison's jumper. From the autopsy report, it was assumed it was from one of the SES or police who helped move her body when she was found. It seems to me that it was just written off. Surely there would have only been a few people involved, and a match could have been made to the brand of gloves the SES or police were wearing? JMO

Yes Indeed ........ The rubber glove tip found in Allison's jumper.
But, there is more........
Those involved in the recovery operation appeared utterly scrupulous in all of their handling, including not moving anything from the position in which the body had been initially found. Not just scrupulous, but utterly professional, including having an understanding as to the significance of all actions.
Repeat "Utterly scrupulous."

At this time, many people were concerned that this was not simply a "missing person" matter, or a "suicide" matter; This matter had all the appearances of a murder most foul. Including all cover-ups. Right from the very beginning.
Those cover-ups had the appearances of coming from high places including political places. (Admittedly some political figures might have initially been simply gullible)

Yet someone later on easily used words, like contamination at scene, when referring to that matter of the glove tip.

Question One: Where did the glove finger tip come from?
Question Two: Where is the incident report? (This is a deadly serious matter.)
Question Three: Is this a deliberate cover up? Why is this not seen as a matter of major significance?
Question Four: Is not the glove tip a matter of major importance?
 
Yes Indeed ........ The rubber glove tip found in Allison's jumper.
But, there is more........
Those involved in the recovery operation appeared utterly scrupulous in all of their handling, including not moving anything from the position in which the body had been initially found. Not just scrupulous, but utterly professional, including having an understanding as to the significance of all actions.
Repeat "Utterly scrupulous."

At this time, many people were concerned that this was not simply a "missing person" matter, or a "suicide" matter; This matter had all the appearances of a murder most foul. Including all cover-ups. Right from the very beginning.
Those cover-ups had the appearances of coming from high places including political places. (Admittedly some political figures might have initially been simply gullible)
Yet someone later on easily used words, like contamination at scene, when referring to that matter of the glove tip.

Question One: Where did the glove finger tip come from?
Question Two: Where is the incident report? (This is a deadly serious matter.)
Question Three: Is this a deliberate cover up? Why is this not seen as a matter of major significance?
Question Four: Is not the glove tip a matter of major importance?

So LadyBird1, is it correct that nothing more was done about the glove tip? I havent read much more than the autopsy report and the phone records. I am appalled to think the glove tip was just merely dismissed! I must admit, the autopsy report was not correct in also merely commenting about the stomach contents. It did not state - specimens to pathology of the stomach contents - but later on reading further I saw that specimens, or fluid must have been taken, but the report certainly did not state that the stomach contents were taken for sampling. Only much later in the report it showed what the stomach contents were.
 
So LadyBird1, is it correct that nothing more was done about the glove tip? I havent read much more than the autopsy report and the phone records. I am appalled to think the glove tip was just merely dismissed! I must admit, the autopsy report was not correct in also merely commenting about the stomach contents. It did not state - specimens to pathology of the stomach contents - but later on reading further I saw that specimens, or fluid must have been taken, but the report certainly did not state that the stomach contents were taken for sampling. Only much later in the report it showed what the stomach contents were.

It appears that Allison's body was handled with the utmost respect and care from the time of her discovery and throughout the entire recovery procedure. So much so, that her precise positioning was not altered. Not at all. Not a skerrick. Except to place her; as is, where is, and how is, onto a lifting device.

This is the reason, that I personally find the glove tip presence to be of utmost importance.
Moreover, the glove tip was found within the jumper, not on the outside.

Should a person either at the scene, or within the autopsy place "accidentally" lose a piece of his or her glove; then an Incident Report would have been mandatory.
 
It appears that Allison's body was handled with the utmost respect and care from the time of her discovery and throughout the entire recovery procedure. So much so, that her precise positioning was not altered. Not at all. Not a skerrick. Except to place her; as is, where is, and how is, onto a lifting device.

This is the reason, that I personally find the glove tip presence to be of utmost importance.
Moreover, the glove tip was found within the jumper, not on the outside.

Should a person either at the scene, or within the autopsy place "accidentally" lose a piece of his or her glove; then an Incident Report would have been mandatory.

I absolutely wholeheartedly agree with you LadyBird1.

What should we do about it? :tantrum:
 
I absolutely wholeheartedly agree with you LadyBird1.

What should we do about it? :tantrum:

Yes Neopolotan, This should not go under the radar. Should not be simply glossed over. Should not be fobbed off. Should not be dismissed, or discredited or had any other excuses made for its presence.
 
I wonder if Marlywings could shed some light on what should happen here? :scared:
 
I absolutely wholeheartedly agree with you LadyBird1.

What should we do about it? :tantrum:

Right from the very beginning, there appears to have been people ready and willing to apply cover ups. Fast.
"Somebody" was quick to dismiss the screams in the night. Oh, and no teenage party goers have ever come forward and explained 'Sorry, it was me." No. Those screams were very probably Allison, screaming for her life.
Looking back, this was not the only red herring strewn about.
Somebody else was quick to lend a mobile phone to the POI.
 
Right from the very beginning, there appears to have been people ready and willing to apply cover ups. Fast.
"Somebody" was quick to dismiss the screams in the night. Oh, and no teenage party goers have ever come forward and explained 'Sorry, it was me." No. Those screams were very probably Allison, screaming for her life.
Looking back, this was not the only red herring strewn about.
Somebody else was quick to lend a mobile phone to the POI.

LadyBird1, what was it about the mobile phone? How come the POI didnt have his own? I dont remember reading about the mobile phone lending.
 
I wonder if Marlywings could shed some light on what should happen here? :scared:

I'd suggest waiting until the trial when there'll no doubt be a whole lot more evidence presented.

All we've seen to date have been affidavits for...1. bail application & 2. Committal hearing (which decides if there's sufficient evidence to send the accused to trial....which there was)

The trial is expected to run for around four weeks with 200 or so witnesses to be called. In my opinion...a whole lot more evidence still to come!
 
Does Jury Selection take place on the day the trial officially starts or beforehand?

llyrisk....beforehand. A post of mine from back on 13th March,2014 when the case was mentioned on ABC news.

All I managed to catch on ABC radio midday news was...

Trial is expected to last five weeks.

Up to 280 witnesses will be called. (Don't quote me on the 280...it could have been 80 although I think there'd be far more than that...lol.)

Jury selection begins soon & all those selected will be given a however many pages long questionnaire to answer.

(pick me :))

A report from the following day....

March 14, 2014

JURORS in the murder trial of accused wife killer Gerard Baden-Clay could be polled by lawyers to see if they are biased .

The Supreme Court in Brisbane was yesterday told the quizzing of likely jurors was one of a range of pre-trial issues that needed to be clarified before Baden-Clay’s trial started in June

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...gerard-badenclay/story-fnihsrf2-1226854192676
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
84
Guests online
2,648
Total visitors
2,732

Forum statistics

Threads
590,013
Messages
17,928,986
Members
228,038
Latest member
shmoozie
Back
Top