Now that we have been able to brainstorm about exactly what the evidence against Damien Echols was, I thought we could now do that comprehensive analysis of all the evidence and demonstrate how and why there is reasonable doubt as to Echols guilt, or for others, how and why there is no reasonable doubt as to his guilt. Regardless, at that point, it cannot be argued that another is not acknowledging all of the evidence in coming to their conclusions nor that one has failed to comprehensively analyze all of the evidence against Echols Here is the list of evidence I have brought over from the other thread. 1. Damien's lifestyle/writing (1 and 2 from CR). 2. Fibers 3. Girl's club girls 4. Anthony and Narlene Hollingsworth 5. Lake knife 6. Sticks 7. Wax 8. Echol's knowledge of unconfirmed details of the murders.