I've provided other RDI spin theories, such as that the RN is the longest in history (it isn't) or that it has a motherly tone, or that PR somehow acted unreasonably after reading the RN and calling LE and then friends. While I am aware of the theoretical possibility that DNA could be the result of some kind of 3-way innocent transfer between JB and another male (which involves touching her sides of her pants and crouch) the amount of DNA thus transferred would be very small, quite possibily undetectable. Even if it were theoretically possible (A Han Solo One in a Million) it strikes me as much less likely than the official explanation given, namely, an intruder pulled down her pants and performed oral sex on her, where the saliva mixed with her blood from her vagina. When I speak of the RDI spin team, it is that the remote possibility of an innocent explanation is while possible, a more likely explanation than the probable and accepted explanation of an intruder and a sexual assault. The more probable explanation benefits from the plain fact that such an assault would gurantee the presence of his DNA on JB, whereas some kind of touch-transfer would not gurantee such quantity. To suggest that innocent transfer is more likely or more sure way of ensuring DNA detection, sounds like an RDI spin theory. Are there any forensic DNA experts who thinks that the RDI spin on DNA is what most probable explanation of the presence of DNA? In terms of odds, while I don't have exact numbers, to illustrate what I am arguing, if JB touched a male friend, there's a 30% chance his skin DNA would transfer to her skin, but then a 1% chance she'll touch her crouch, and enough skin cell DNA from friend transfer there, where it would mix w/blood from PR-staging, and 0.1% chance enough skin cells remaining for her sides of her pants. If an Intruder were to assault JB, there's a near 100% chance that DNA from his saliva would transfer to JB's pubic area, and near 100% chance that DNA would mix w/her blood, and 95% chance enough of his skin cells DNA would transfer to the sides of her pants. With these kinds of numbers and odds, it is sheer spin-doctoring to suggest that innocent transfer from JB is more likely than intruder. BTW A JIDI is justice is in IDI. Pronounced Jedi. Symbol is green or blue lightsaber. Forensics-sensitive. I've got no idea why RST don't cite McM, but I'm a JIDI. You'd have to ask them. Honestly SD, if the RST DID cite McM, would you put your credibility in what any RST 'expert' (ie John Douglass, FBI profiler, Lou Smit) says? Since the RST do NOT cite McM (perhaps the R's did not pay McM to do his case study?) you now claim that RST failure to trumpet him somehow undermines his credibility? Isn't that spin-doctoring? Since you've not read McM you don't know the power of the Dark Side. Specifically, you've not shown that he needs to be part of the original investigation to draw a valid conclusion. Until you do so, you're spinning his conclusion in a way that makes science and statistics appear invalid. Let's not forget why we are here, to bring justice to JB. What this means is using every available scientifically valid investigative tool to bear. McM foresnic linguistics and DNA are two scientifically valid tools that helps us accurately reconstruct the last night of JB's life. DNA and forensic linguistics and trace fiber evidence are the weapons of the JIDI knights, not clumsy or random like a psychological profile, elegant tools from a more civilized time. For over a thousand generations, the JIDI knights have been the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Investigation. Before the spin times. Before the RDIST. Darth who was a pupil of mine before he turned to spin, helped the RDIST hunt down and destroy the JIDI knights. Darth was seduced by the dark side of spin. Forensics is what gives the JIDI his power. It is the foundation that brings all the elements of crime together and binds justice in society together.