Appeals

Discussion in 'West Memphis III' started by Rindicella, Jul 20, 2010.

  1. Rindicella

    Rindicella New Member

    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Retrial and after that, new investigation by outside agency.
    I'm disgusted and ashamed.

    These victims deserve to have true justice. So far, they've gotten a Juicy Fruit, a Dr. Pepper and a box of Cracker Jacks.
    Pathetic.
     
  2. Loading...


  3. EntreNous

    EntreNous New Member

    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    my honest answer is that i don't know, but there certainly seems to be ample evidence to the contrary of their guilt. i agree with rindicella, new trial, new independent investigation. i do not believe justice prevailed for those three little boys.
     
  4. iluvmua

    iluvmua Active Member

    Messages:
    6,985
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    38
    DE appeal hearing will happen on September 30, If they deny that then what happens? I believe this is his very last appeal.

    I think that if He gets a new trial it is only fair that Jason & Jessie get one too, even if they are granted a new trial and found guilty again at least give all three of them new trials.
     
  5. Dirty larry

    Dirty larry Former Member

    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually that hearing is in regards to a Writ of Certori filed in 2009 in regards to Burnett's ruling on the DNA claim.

    The Defense is essentially asking the ASSC to review Burnett's ruling for procedural errors.

    The ASSC can't grant a new trial over the hearing - they can't even rule on the DNA claim itself, as it's still in the circuit court's jurisdiction.

    They can only order Burnett to rule again on the DNA claim if they find he did in fact err.

    Echol's only remaining "appeal" is the federal Habeas Corpus writ which was filed in 2007.

    In that appeal, Roirdan attempted a "Schlup/House" claim in order to use the DNA testing to enter other evidence that normally wouldn't have been allowed in Federal court.

    That claim has been held in abeyance until the DNA claim was exausted in state court, and once it is, it's no longer a valid federal claim - and the HC writ becomes meaningless.

    That's why the Defense is dragging the state exaustion out as long as they possibly can.
     
  6. iluvmua

    iluvmua Active Member

    Messages:
    6,985
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I was wondering what was taking them so long. I go back and forth on this case. Did they do it? Did they not do it? It's hard to tell.
     
  7. annkitty0630

    annkitty0630 New Member

    Messages:
    209
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    WOW, such legal mumbo jumbo!! I still HOPE with all my soul that he wins the appeal and there can be a new trial??? Still don't believe the "WM3" are guilty of these crimes against these little boys!! JMHO!!
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice