April 26, 2011 Hailey dunn timeline-4 months later

Discussion in 'Hailey Dunn' started by peeples, Apr 27, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. peeples

    peeples New Member

    Messages:
    6,066
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  2. Loading...


  3. Adrienne37

    Adrienne37 Former Member

    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks peeples. It would be nice if Shawn and Billie would tell where Hailey is.


    ~jmo~
     
  4. Curious Me

    Curious Me Registered User of Space and Time

    Messages:
    11,554
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Thanks, peeples. I look for news about Hailey.

    It is nice to see Hailey in the news, but sad that it's the same old timeline that never made sense or checked out. I know I have to be patient. I just wish we knew the truth about what happened to Hailey. It's been four months now.
     
  5. Soulmagent

    Soulmagent New Member

    Messages:
    7,563
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I hope this is a typo. I am not assuming it to be one though. :waitasec:

    http://bigcountryhomepage.com/fulltext?nxd_id=329087

    This timeline says the dogs went from somewhere to somewhere else. FWIW. But I am not sure we are supposed to use it as a point of reference or not.
     
  6. Curious Me

    Curious Me Registered User of Space and Time

    Messages:
    11,554
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I don't want to sound picky, but the timeline now shouldn't include misinformation believed then. It's far from a fact guide. It can be misleading, starting with when Hailey actually disappearred. The dogs and witnesses line items are also not true fact. I expect too much? IDK, it's just that after four months I was hoping to see more clarification.

    Reading news articles lately always leaves me :waitasec:
     
  7. Soulmagent

    Soulmagent New Member

    Messages:
    7,563
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I suppose it is possible that because LE wont offer to clear up any conflicts in the issues with the witnesses and the dogs. The paper has to go by what they were told? So maybe the media has the information they are supposed to have and LE is the one that cant say anything else on the subject.

    If LE could clear it up they would right?

    In all honestly we truely do not know if the witness statements and dog statements are facts or not. We know what LE told us first and then they told us something different ,that they were mistaken, not up to date on current information etc.. So how do we know that they are honest mistakes or they were saying that as spook a suspect?
    The whole eletronic timeline could be because they wanted to have someone believe they have evidence that they really dont have.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice