Are We "Discussed Out"?

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by capps, May 23, 2005.

  1. capps

    capps New Member

    Messages:
    2,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can it possibly be that we are at an end of discussion for this case?

    Looking back ... posters have looked at every angle from ever little piece of evidence that was available to us, over and over again.

    Everyone has been suspect,we've left no one out. Have we looked closely enough at the Ramsey dog??? lol.

    The Ramsey's are no longer trying to find the killer ... Boulder has the case all filed away,(although they will not admit it.)

    Some posters feel it has been solved,(are your ears ringing BlueCrab?). But,that is just theories (albeit good ones).

    So with no new evidence,or any news for that matter.... are we all "discussed out"?
     
  2. Loading...


  3. skybluepink

    skybluepink New Member

    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The level of discourse does seem to have dropped in the past month or so--coincident with the disappearance of Red Chief. However, I'm in for the duration, determined as ever. Let's think positive, peoples.
     
  4. DebE

    DebE Former Member

    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Good post Capps, and an even better question. It seems every detail of this case has been discussed a million times. I have read everything there is to read about it at least a dozen times, but I just can't get over the fact that poor JonBenet is dead and her killer is still "on the loose." I have resigned myself, although reluctantly, that this case may never be solved. But, I do know that one day, whoever committed this crime will face the ultimate judgement day.
     
  5. lawman

    lawman New Member

    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    hi everyone,

    anybody have any details about the samsonite case found near the broken window in the train room.my question really is about how the items found in the case happened to be there i.e is it not strange ?


    lawman
     
  6. Seeker

    Seeker Former Member

    Messages:
    3,475
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think the main problem stems from lack of any new information.
    I do think certain things have been "discussed to death", but I also know that every day I get a new perspective of things from other people's posts.

    My biggest concern is that everything has been over analyzed...

    I.E. a mountain made out of a molehill.
     
  7. Toltec

    Toltec New Member

    Messages:
    1,644
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Strange indeed. We know it is JAR's suitcase and the contents are his also. A duvet and a Dr. Seuss book of which the title we are not privy to.

    The duvet had JAR's semen stain on it. But what is most puzzling is that the duvet fibers were on JonBenet's body or clothes...don't remember which.

    John Ramsey did not know where he last saw the suitcase but Patsy told LE that the last place she saw the suitcase was in the boiler room...the room next to the wine cellar.

    hmmmmm

    As far as case discussion goes...I myself am still here because I enjoy interacting with my fellow websleuthers.
     
  8. sassy_texasbelle2

    sassy_texasbelle2 Well butter my butt and call me a biscuit

    Messages:
    2,280
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Did anyone watch the show on CTV last night where four investigators were discussing the case? I missed part of it, and was just wondering what someone that saw it all might think now.
     
  9. Rainsong

    Rainsong Former Member

    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The show was a repeat of one ofthe infamous Tracy documentaries edited for American audiences. Nothing new. Nothing tangible. But what it did show was the ineptitude of the BPD.

    Rainsong
     
  10. capps

    capps New Member

    Messages:
    2,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It was just 12 days ago that I entered this thread "Are We Discussed Out".

    Since then,there have been 17 new threads,with numerous posts attached to them.

    The moral of this post: We are NOT discussed out,whether we get frustrated,confused,mind boggled, and yes some times just plain mad,we will endure,and be here for the long haul.

    That's a good thing!
     
  11. texaslb218

    texaslb218 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,149
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I am running to catch up so any discussion here is interesting to me. Thanks, guys!
     
  12. tipper

    tipper Former Member

    Messages:
    1,795
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are those the same dark fibers LE said in the deopsition belonged to John's shirt but didn't let Lin Wood see the lab report?
     
  13. Jayelles

    Jayelles New Member

    Messages:
    2,389
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In fairness, the detectives aren't likely to have transported the 40 boxes of case documents with them to the depositions - wouldn't you agree?
     
  14. tipper

    tipper Former Member

    Messages:
    1,795
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    True, but I think anticipating that he would want verification of their claim about the fibers isn't too big a stretch.

    Almost forgot - Someone was asking about the photo from the Christmas party on the 23rd. Do you still have a copy and if so could you post it?
     
  15. BlueCrab

    BlueCrab New Member

    Messages:
    3,053
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0

    tipper,

    The black fibers found on the genital area of JonBenet's panties supposedly came from John's black shirt he wore to the White's dinner party on the 25th.

    The fibers found on the genital area of JonBenet's body supposedly came from JAR's blanket that was in the suitcase. The blanket also had JAR's semen on it.
     
  16. lawman

    lawman New Member

    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    bluecrab would you be able to post some sources for these claims please, this is of vital importance to the case.i thought you said the F.B.I disagreed with the JAR duvet fibers.
     
  17. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,188
    Likes Received:
    146
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Although there is mention of JR's shirt fibers, there is no mention of any fibers that may have been sourced from the black pants JonBenet wore to the Whites party.

    Is this an omission by design, also I wonder if the black fibers from the shirt are on the inside or the outside of the genital area? The importance of this lies in whether you consider her underwear new on!

    New on and if inside the genital area, then that will take some explaining away.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice