CATCH THE LATEST WEBSLEUTHS RADIO AS WE LOOK INTO THE TERRIFYING WORLD OF MEDICAL SERIAL KILLERS
CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

Articles on LHP & the Supreme Court

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by candy, Jan 13, 2004.

  1. candy

    candy Inactive

    Messages:
    324
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~56~1887098,00.html

    Article Published: Tuesday, January 13, 2004
    Ramseys' nanny loses appeal in publishing case
    Author challenged grand-jury secrecy law

    By Mike McPhee
    Denver Post Staff Writer



    http://www.dailycamera.com/bdc/city_news/article/0,1713,BDC_2422_2572440,00.html

    Ramsey worker's appeal not heard
    Family's former housekeeper challenged grand jury secrecy rule


    By Mary Butler, Camera Staff Writer
    January 13, 2004


    http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/ramsey/article/0,1299,DRMN_1296_2572450,00.htm

    Ruling goes against Ramsey employee
    Former housekeeper barred from printing grand jury testimony

    By Charlie Brennan, Rocky Mountain News
    January 13, 2004
     
  2. Barbara

    Barbara New Member

    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks Candy,

    While this may not be a very popular opinion, I happen to agree with the ruling.

    LHP can certainly write her book telling everything she knows without stating what she was asked in the GJ and how she answered. We can read between the lines and assume the things written were told to the GJ.

    This is an open murder case and if LHP had been allowed to reveal the testimony of the GJ, that opens the door for all to speak who were involved.

    As much as I would like to know everything, my curiousity being satisfied in no way helps move this case forward, despite my personal belief that it will never be solved.

    There is no reason why the testimony should be revealed allowing the suspects to gain even more knowledge (if that's possible) than they already have. I can understand Lin's disappointment that the testimony is not public.

    I cling to the hope that there is evidence that is not known to many involved and may someday be helpful. It's a really small cling, but you never know.
     
  3. BrotherMoon

    BrotherMoon Former Member

    Messages:
    753
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If they wanted to, if they were clever, they could put whatever they wanted to in the book. Mask it in a story about rats, something like that. Could be done. Why try to be good at this point? Fight Evil on it's own terms.
     
  4. BlueCrab

    BlueCrab New Member

    Messages:
    3,053
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Rats? Yeah, that'll work. Rats come in through broken basement windows. They should get the DNA of all male rats in Boulder.

    JMO
     
  5. K777angel

    K777angel New Member

    Messages:
    515
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I agree with you Barbara. This book should not have been published.
    How LHP ever got as far as she did in writing it is a little hard to understand.
     
  6. Blazeboy3

    Blazeboy3 Inactive

    Messages:
    776
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yup...say it is so(ain't so?;why not?) ... could/should happen (if there's a will...surely there's a WAY, right-o? ...LOL)...??? :slap: :)
     

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice