Ozazure you may have heard that but a poster here said they saw Sarah say that on tv so obviously two different interviews.
What another poster says is irrelevant, people get their wires crossed and make inferences that don't hold up to what was actually reported. If you can link to a direct quote from an article I'm all ears.
There is very little known publicly about the timeline of events. From Borce we have that their was an argument and a walk at 10am and he's the last to see her. By 11pm June 30th a tweet from Vic police, so we know someone reported her missing within a day or so - could have been the 29th for all we know.
Post her disappearance we know there was a 3AW interview by Sarah, a press conference outside the Avondale Heights police station where Borce and Sarah speak, one later at the Maribyrnong River where only Patricia does. Borce speaks to the media about financial misreporting ... or rather, wrong "inferences" taken from factually correct information.
Then later we learn more of the timeline - a drive up the Calder and two sets of matching phone pings for his and Karen's phones as well as a period of 2 hours when his phone was off, and a phone call from her work. Not directly quoted and assumed leaked.
We have no idea when Sarah last saw or spoke to her or expected to see her. No idea what Karen's movements were the day before or what time she was expected at work. No idea what Sarah and Karen's usual communications looked like, despite how others characterise it. No idea that if Sarah had been texting or calling her that she found Karen's radio silence unusual or concerning prior to realising she was missing. All that would tell us more about what went on, just as finding out about the Calder trip turned me from thinking it was possible Karen had done a runner to thinking it is extremely unlikely she wasn't killed by Borce.
