I hope he doesn't involve anyone in a get rich quick scheme that will more than "fund their retirement".Do we know if he’s still in respite/aged care? His vulnerable ‘house mates’ need protection from him.
On 22 August I checked if he was still there and he was not.Do we know if he’s still in respite/aged care? His vulnerable ‘house mates’ need protection from him.
I feel like putting him in aged care was all part of the act to play up the defenseless old man to the coronerOn 22 August I checked if he was still there and he was not.
Personally agree. Might have even said he was showing signs of dementia, he probably put in the performances of his life to establish he’s not compos in prep for the coming criminal investigation.I feel like putting him in aged care was all part of the act to play up the defenseless old man to the coroner
she doesn't deserve any respite from him IMOMaybe putting him in the home was just a bit of respite for his wife.
Perhaps you’re right but wouldn’t it be fantastic if that respite gave her some space to reconsider her stance of saying as little as possible. She must know more than she is letting on.she doesn't deserve any respite from him IMO
He’s probably just used up all his free respite days for the year.On 22 August I checked if he was still there and he was not.
SL has commented that there is an issue with the MPMB FB page preventing them from putting up any posts at the moment.I agree. The silence is deafening…
the authorities are possibly having to make sure that all the facts are substantiated, as there are many eyes cast on this inquest.
Hopefully Sally will have an outcome soon
I have been listening to the podcast Finding Samantha, and I was constantly thinking about RB, some of the similarities are incredible. I can't believe how easy it was for her to obtain fake passports, ID and to travel using false documents. She was able to use social media to create fake profiles which people could look her up and assume she was genuinely who she said she was.I’m watching ‘Con Girl’ about fraudster Samantha Azzopardi. So many similarities!
Ooh I’ll listen to that too. What struck me was the warped psychology behind it all. And the ‘con’ approaches used. Isolating victims, instil a sense of urgency around false narratives, etc etc. These people are so dangerous. Horrible that our systems don’t protect victims.I have been listening to the podcast Finding Samantha, and I was constantly thinking about RB, some of the similarities are incredible. I can't believe how easy it was for her to obtain fake passports, ID and to travel using false documents. She was able to use social media to create fake profiles which people could look her up and assume she was genuinely who she said she was.
Mind blown!!
So true. I was married to a man who perpetrated fraud. He was the smartest person I've ever known and could have had a brilliant career at many things. He only defrauded his family, and needless to say, his childhood was horrible. I always believed he was subconsciously wreaking revenge. The reasons don't matter. What matters is the wake of destruction fraudsters and con-artists leave. My children are still affected by learning our life was a sham, and their father was a crook.A lot of us have asked what motivates RB when he doesn't appear to make a lot of money from his (alleged) cons looking at the meagre life he appears to live? I know it may be that it has funded his travel and potentially paid for properties, but my interest piqued when I heard part of an interview with psychologist and author, Dr Maria Konnikova who wrote 'The Confidence Game' among other books, she also the host of a podcast The Grift about con artists and the lives they ruin. The Grift on Apple Podcasts
These are her words on the ABC Unravel podcast Snowball (Ep 7) with Ollie Ward. When Ollie met Lezlie - ABC listen
I thought this was a very interesting analysis.
MK was asked what motivates the con when people don't get away with a lot of money. She said "That is not at all uncommon, I think it' s a huge misperception among the public that con artists are motivated by money, I really think that's not it at all because for the most part con artists don't make a lot of money and are incredibly intelligent and could've made much more money in more legitimate professions. So I don't actually think it's about financial gain at all, I think that why they do it is power. They're motivated in the sense of power over other people, control over other people's lives, the idea that they're shaping other people's reality in a way that they want to shape it. This is something that can be incredibly intoxicating, and I think that that feeling of power is actually one of the reasons that con artists are more often than not, and by more often than not I mean like in 90% of cases, true con artists are repeat offenders and given the opportunity to go straight (so to speak) they don't take it, they won't take it even though they say they will and they want to because they're always driven back to that and they are unable to let go of that rush of power over other people. I mean it is intoxicating if you think about it, you're playing God, you're controlling other people's lives, you're crafting their realities, you're creating entire worlds and people believe you."
So true. I was married to a man who perpetrated fraud. He was the smartest person I've ever known and could have had a brilliant career at many things. He only defrauded his family, and needless to say, his childhood was horrible. I always believed he was subconsciously wreaking revenge. The reasons don't matter. What matters is the wake of destruction fraudsters and con-artists leave. My children are still affected by learning our life was a sham, and their father was a crook.