SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,177
- Reaction score
- 174,790
I did read about it, as if neither FFC nor MFC helped little W getting up and they only wondered, why the boy lay motionless. THAT I found very irresponsible and wrong and incomprehensible. Little W easily could have had a brain concussion at least, so I understood his fall with the chair.
I was thinking about, whether he could have had the after effects of this fall on the day, he "disappeared" (instead of "falling from a balcony").
I think only FD was present for that accident, wasn't he? FM is not mentioned. Just that daddy was there to help William.
I think it is possible that William was starting to show some cognitive issues. Which happens with some children who have been exposed to drugs/alcohol during gestation. (I am not sure what the drug part of William's removal was about, while it is obvious what the DV part was about.)
If things like foetal alcohol syndrome can be diagnosed before a child is 6 years old, there are ways to assist the child to deal with the central nervous system difficulties. But these things cannot be diagnosed at birth ... they show up during the child's development. (My friend's foster son has FAS, it is a lifelong thing but took years to diagnose.)
Or William could just have been having a childhood accident, like my niece did at 3 years old when she fell from a porch railing and broke her collar bone - despite having been told 8,999 times not to swing from the railing,
I imagine FD was momentarily confused why William didn't cry or get up immediately. So he helped him up.
In that interview, FD answered more than 727 questions ... it was a very long interview.
But the DM (who evidently have the interview documents) have mentioned only a few of those questions.
imo
"At that point, 727 questions into the interview ..... "
Documents lift lid on William Tyrrell case
Last edited: