It just occurred to me, pure speculation only, that maybe MFC knew FGM before forming a relationship with FFC. Just given that he seems so familiar with the Kendall area, plus apparently routinely organised family visits to FGM.
It just occurred to me, pure speculation only, that maybe MFC knew FGM before forming a relationship with FFC. Just given that he seems so familiar with the Kendall area, plus apparently routinely organised family visits to FGM.
JMO - I think I have now grasped what you are demonstrating JLZ, but in the case of the Fosters they are different to the Levesons .... in that they, as the most recent people to have seen him, provided inconsistent information about their activities in relation to William's disappearance.
9now.nine.com.au
From the research and books I've read over the years, detectives often stay in touch with the families. They get to know them so well I guess. Deepest secrets are brought out into the open and it becomes clear if they are decent people or not. I mean, unless they are arch manipulators with no conscience and a fine line in bs.
Yes I still trust Gary Jubelin’s opinion and judgment.
I don't think this the case.
GJ had received approval to place a listening device on the FP’s car before they were ruled out, it’s highly likely it was approved again. WA’s cops received worldwide praise for their handling of CS’s investigation, it was a good incentive for NSWPOL to gain back public approval with WT’s investigation with a new focus on the FPs, FM was named as a POI, an approval would be guaranteed, imo.
www.abc.net.au
So would you agree PS that Police likely captured the alleged "Assault" by a listening device they had planted?GJ had received approval to place a listening device on the FP’s car before they were ruled out, it’s highly likely it was approved again. WA’s cops received worldwide praise for their handling of CS’s investigation, it was a good incentive for NSWPOL to gain back public approval with WT’s investigation with a new focus on the FPs, FM was named as a POI, an approval would be guaranteed, imo.
The listening devices at PS’s house were approved by a magistrate for surveillance for a specific time, but the warrant had expired when GJ recorded a further four interactions with PS, this needs to stated because it’s misleading otherwise.
I don’t agree there needs to be a very strong case for a listening device to be used, if the police state their reasons to a magistrate, why would they disallow it, they’ve got nothing to work on but what’s put before them unless it obviously appears to be frivolous, which SFR is not under any circumstances.
JMO
Former lead detective reveals police bugged car of William Tyrrell's foster-parents
Gary Jubelin, who headed the police investigation for four years, says William Tyrrell's foster-parents were interrogated and placed under a covert operation that involved placing a listening device in their car before being ruled out as suspects.
They may well have, they’d need to piece it together though, ask for neighbour witnesses because the devices wouldn’t be all over the house. The bedrooms wouldn’t have been bugged, imo.
