ListenUpOasis
ListenUpOasis is offline Registered User
Join Date:Apr 2015Posts:9
The concerning thing about this thread is the amount of people who are willing to take the police as being above all suspicion.
I for one have two lawyer relatives who have told me countless times to never trust police. In high profile cases, when the pressure is more intense to get a conviction, I am always wary of police.
Bill Speeding has no prior criminal record, and considering the potential crimes he is accused of, I am a bit surprised that this is the case. The fact media were there to photograph the accused being arrested shows that the media have been tipped off prior. All of this is a common tactic used by police to contaminate a potential jury pool.
As is seen on this thread, most people here have the accused guilty as charged.
People need to understand that the police are not their to uncover the truth, rather, they are there to get convictions. There is a difference.
Bill Speeding apparently made a 10 page statement to police a few months ago re William Tyrell. Anyone getting interviewed by police is going to be nervous. It is very easy to make basic factual errors under that duress that can then be used against you.
It is the reason for the right to remain silent and one should always exercise it.
I for one under no circumstances will ever co-operate with police. I dont trust them [modsnip].
The sad thing is that most people are so uneducated not to ever question the police and the agenda they push.
Innocent until guilty. Some people here should remember how they would react if they were accused of a crime.
Last edited by Coldpizza; Yesterday at 09:46 PM. Reason: Please don't tell others how to think.
ListenUpOasis
I couldn't DISAGREE with you more.......in my opinion your opinion is a load of rot