Sorry to bombard everyone. MOO!!
But I feel that those photos on the back patio with the Foster Grandmother reading a paper and her slippers on - was before breakfast
They were having a cuppa and maybe discussing that the formal adoption of the 2 foster children which was getting closer to being a reality. Maybe the FGM was raising some concerns to her daughter (were they close- could be a factor - if FGM commented in a way to criticise FFC parenting style - set her on edge- family dynamics are great for stirring up heated emotions)
You know how parents say things that leave a worm hole in your brain - maybe the FGM and FFC where discussing how W was more of a handful.
So maybe the photos were taken to demonstrate W's interactions with the activities they had set up for him - dice throwing, colouring etc. ( I believe "Megnut" may have a good theory about this)
Rather than the photos being a momento of the day - and this is why the FGM stuck a newspaper in front of herself - because the photo was to capture W's play style not a family portrait.
So I just question the whole timeline that has been put forth, because I am getting a feeling this photo was earlier than suggested and I am basing it on:-
:- the FGM wearing slippers
:- L wearing a jacket
:- W not wearing any shoes at all.
:- W shoes facing out from the sliding door - shoes facing in the direction of where you want the child to wear them - going outside. ( Otherwise if Shoes are facing towards the door - you have been outside already and are taking them off before coming inside - its a small point but I am insane with detail)
Bizarre connection between William Tyrrell handyman, paedophile